Immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with testicular cancer: A systematic review.

638 Background: Germ cell tumors (GCT) are chemosensitive neoplasms with high cure rates, even in the metastatic setting. However, a small group of these patients will present tumors refractory to chemotherapy, with a dismal prognosis and very few effective management options. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved for use in chemotherapy-refractory GCT for those tumors with a high microsatellite instability (MSI-H/dMMR) or high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H), the evidence supporting this indication is scarce. Methods: Original research studies, conducted on patients with GCT refractory to chemotherapy treated with ICI up to December 2023 were included. Comprehensive search strategies of 5 databases and MeSH keywords were used to locate eligible literature. Study characteristics, participant demographics, and oncological outcomes were recorded. Results: A total of 13 studies (n = 106) were identified for inclusion; 5 of which corresponded to single-patient case reports, one was identified as a retrospective cohort, 6 were phase II RCTs and we included a recent abstract from the preliminary results of a phase II RCT. Most of the studies evaluated did not request biomarkers as inclusion criteria. The median overall response rate across all patients included was 3.4% (range, 0-57), versus 0% (range 0-6) in those reported in retrospective cohort and phase II studies. Progressive disease as best clinical response was reported in most patients, with 75% (range, 0-82.9) in the overall population and 82% (range, 75 -83) in patients from retrospective cohort and phase II trials. Some of the most durable clinical responses documented in this systematic review corresponded to TMB-H or MSI-H/dMMR tumors. Conclusions: Analysis from retrospective cohorts and clinical trials evaluating ICIs for the treatment of chemotherapy-refractory GCT documented a limited activity of these drugs as a single intervention in patients not selected by biomarkers, with a tendency to better results described in those with TMB-H or MSI-H/dMMR tumors. Future prospective study designs should attempt to select patients by biomarkers to shed light on the determination of clinical and molecular factors that can predict response to ICIs in this scenario.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.638
Primary Topic
Testicular diseases and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with testicular cancer: A systematic review.

Neri Alejandro Álvarez‐Villalobos, Rosalaura Virginia Villarreal-González, Carlos Eduardo Salazar-Mejía, Carlos Cruz et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Testicular diseases and treatments
article

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with testicular cancer: A systematic review.

Neri Alejandro Álvarez‐Villalobos, Rosalaura Virginia Villarreal-González, Carlos Eduardo Salazar-Mejía, Carlos Cruz, Óscar Vidal-Gutiérrez, Sofia Alejandra Alvarado-Ruiz, Andrea Sarahi Guerra-Garza, Estefanía Guadarrama-Rendón, Ramiro Quiroz-Huerta, Karina Alicia Salazar-Salazar
article en

Abstract

638 Background: Germ cell tumors (GCT) are chemosensitive neoplasms with high cure rates, even in the metastatic setting. However, a small group of these patients will present tumors refractory to chemotherapy, with a dismal prognosis and very few effective management options. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved for use in chemotherapy-refractory GCT for those tumors with a high microsatellite instability (MSI-H/dMMR) or high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H), the evidence supporting this indication is scarce. Methods: Original research studies, conducted on patients with GCT refractory to chemotherapy treated with ICI up to December 2023 were included. Comprehensive search strategies of 5 databases and MeSH keywords were used to locate eligible literature. Study characteristics, participant demographics, and oncological outcomes were recorded. Results: A total of 13 studies (n = 106) were identified for inclusion; 5 of which corresponded to single-patient case reports, one was identified as a retrospective cohort, 6 were phase II RCTs and we included a recent abstract from the preliminary results of a phase II RCT. Most of the studies evaluated did not request biomarkers as inclusion criteria. The median overall response rate across all patients included was 3.4% (range, 0-57), versus 0% (range 0-6) in those reported in retrospective cohort and phase II studies. Progressive disease as best clinical response was reported in most patients, with 75% (range, 0-82.9) in the overall population and 82% (range, 75 -83) in patients from retrospective cohort and phase II trials. Some of the most durable clinical responses documented in this systematic review corresponded to TMB-H or MSI-H/dMMR tumors. Conclusions: Analysis from retrospective cohorts and clinical trials evaluating ICIs for the treatment of chemotherapy-refractory GCT documented a limited activity of these drugs as a single intervention in patients not selected by biomarkers, with a tendency to better results described in those with TMB-H or MSI-H/dMMR tumors. Future prospective study designs should attempt to select patients by biomarkers to shed light on the determination of clinical and molecular factors that can predict response to ICIs in this scenario.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
Hospital Universitario Dr José Eleuterio Gonzalez (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Testicular diseases and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.