Final overall survival of ARIES trial evaluating first line avelumab monotherapy for patients with advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) unfit for cisplatin and outcome analysis based on baseline characteristics.

797 Background: ARIES trial evaluated avelumab monotherapy in PD-L1+ve aUC patients (pts) not eligible to cisplatin-based chemotherapy, reaching its primary endpoint (Iacovelli R et al. ASCO-GU 2022). Treatment landscape for aUC has changed since enfortumab-vedotin and pembrolizumab (EV+P) has become the new standard for platinum-eligible pts reporting also a mPFS of 10.6 mos and 1-y OS rate of about 80% in cisplatin ineligible (carboplatin-eligible) pts. Unfortunately, up to 20% of pts are not eligible to platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) and guidelines continue to recommend immunotherapy alone. Methods: Pts with PDL1+ve aUC and not eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy were enrolled and treated with avelumab until progression of disease. Here we reported the final OS, and we evaluated the baseline differences between pts with longer PFS compared to those who immediately progressed. Baseline characteristic included in this analysis were sites of metastases, performance status, body mass index (BMI), haematological values and the Neutrophils-to-Lymphocytes Ratio (NLR). Results: 71 pts were enrolled, the median age was 75 years (range 38 – 88); bladder cancer was the primary tumour in 73.2% of cases, 25.3% had liver metastases, 31% had ECOG=2 and 31% had renal function <50ml/min. After a median FU of 52 mos, the median OS was 10.3 mos (95%CI 5.3 – 15.3) and the median PFS was 2.1 mos (95%CI 1.8 – 2.4). 26 pts (37%) received subsequent therapies, with gem+carbo as most frequently used (15 pts, 21%). A total of 18 pts (25%) had a PFS ≥9 mos while 44 (62%) had a PFS ≤3 mos. Significant differences between these two groups were the presence of liver mets (11% vs. 36%; p=0.047), the presence of node only disease (39% vs 5%; p<0.001) and the rate of pts with NLR>4 (22% vs. 61%; p=0.005). At multivariable analysis only NLR>4 and liver mets were confirmed to be independent prognostic factors. The 27 pts (38%) without liver mets and with NLR>4 had significantly (p=0.001) prolonged mPFS (7.7 vs. 1.9 mos), mOS (20.4 vs. 5.7 mos), and 1y OS rate (67% vs. 32%). Conclusions: ARIES trial confirmed the activity of avelumab in cisplatin-ineligible aUC pts including those not eligible to PBC. This analysis also identified the absence of liver mets and low values of NRL as potential markers of significant benefit from immunotherapy alone. This evidence can be used for a personalized approach in the evolving treatment landscape of aUC. Clinical trial information: NCT03891238 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.797
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Final overall survival of ARIES trial evaluating first line avelumab monotherapy for patients with advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) unfit for cisplatin and outcome analysis based on baseline characteristics.

Elena Verri, Stefania Di Girolamo, Luciano Stumbo, Sebastiano Buti et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

Final overall survival of ARIES trial evaluating first line avelumab monotherapy for patients with advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) unfit for cisplatin and outcome analysis based on baseline characteristics.

Elena Verri, Stefania Di Girolamo, Luciano Stumbo, Sebastiano Buti, Matteo Santoni, Emanuele Naglieri, Chiara Ciccarese, Luca Galli, Chiara Ligato, Silvia Puglisi, Emanuela Fantinel, Rocco De Vivo, Matteo Brunelli, Giampaolo Tortora, Consuelo Buttigliero, Laura Milesi, Roberto Iacovelli, Elisa Biscaldi, Denis Occhipinti, Claudia Mosillo
article en

Abstract

797 Background: ARIES trial evaluated avelumab monotherapy in PD-L1+ve aUC patients (pts) not eligible to cisplatin-based chemotherapy, reaching its primary endpoint (Iacovelli R et al. ASCO-GU 2022). Treatment landscape for aUC has changed since enfortumab-vedotin and pembrolizumab (EV+P) has become the new standard for platinum-eligible pts reporting also a mPFS of 10.6 mos and 1-y OS rate of about 80% in cisplatin ineligible (carboplatin-eligible) pts. Unfortunately, up to 20% of pts are not eligible to platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) and guidelines continue to recommend immunotherapy alone. Methods: Pts with PDL1+ve aUC and not eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy were enrolled and treated with avelumab until progression of disease. Here we reported the final OS, and we evaluated the baseline differences between pts with longer PFS compared to those who immediately progressed. Baseline characteristic included in this analysis were sites of metastases, performance status, body mass index (BMI), haematological values and the Neutrophils-to-Lymphocytes Ratio (NLR). Results: 71 pts were enrolled, the median age was 75 years (range 38 – 88); bladder cancer was the primary tumour in 73.2% of cases, 25.3% had liver metastases, 31% had ECOG=2 and 31% had renal function <50ml/min. After a median FU of 52 mos, the median OS was 10.3 mos (95%CI 5.3 – 15.3) and the median PFS was 2.1 mos (95%CI 1.8 – 2.4). 26 pts (37%) received subsequent therapies, with gem+carbo as most frequently used (15 pts, 21%). A total of 18 pts (25%) had a PFS ≥9 mos while 44 (62%) had a PFS ≤3 mos. Significant differences between these two groups were the presence of liver mets (11% vs. 36%; p=0.047), the presence of node only disease (39% vs 5%; p<0.001) and the rate of pts with NLR>4 (22% vs. 61%; p=0.005). At multivariable analysis only NLR>4 and liver mets were confirmed to be independent prognostic factors. The 27 pts (38%) without liver mets and with NLR>4 had significantly (p=0.001) prolonged mPFS (7.7 vs. 1.9 mos), mOS (20.4 vs. 5.7 mos), and 1y OS rate (67% vs. 32%). Conclusions: ARIES trial confirmed the activity of avelumab in cisplatin-ineligible aUC pts including those not eligible to PBC. This analysis also identified the absence of liver mets and low values of NRL as potential markers of significant benefit from immunotherapy alone. This evidence can be used for a personalized approach in the evolving treatment landscape of aUC. Clinical trial information: NCT03891238 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
University of Verona (IT), University of Parma (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Azienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia (IT), Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri (IT), Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII (IT), Medica (Italy) (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera S.Maria (IT), Istituto Tumori Bari (IT), Campus Bio Medico University Hospital (IT), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT), Ospedale San Bortolo (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Ospedale San Luigi Gonzaga (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana (IT), University of Macerata (IT), University of Turin (IT), European Institute of Oncology (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.