Optimizing treatment approaches in nested bladder tumors: A multicenter retrospective study.

743 Background: Identifying optimal treatment strategies in nested bladder tumors is critical. This multicenter study aims at evaluating progression-free survival (PFS) end overall survival (OS) according to disease extent, presentation and treatment including Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), radical cystectomy (RC) and chemotherapy (CT). Methods: Data were collected from 61 patients with nested bladder tumors across 5 centers over a 10-year period (2013–2023). Patients were stratified according to 1) time of diagnosis of nested variant (disease onset Vs recurrence) 2) disease extent (NMIBC vs MIB, vs cN+ Vs M+) 3) treatment groups based on their initial treatment: ( BCG ± RC vs RC only Vs RC + CT). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess median PFS (mPFS) and median OS (mOS), while p-values <0.05 was used to determine statistical significance across groups. Results: The median follow-up was 30.6 months (95% CI: 16.4–40.6). At diagnosis 15 (24.6%) were NMIBC, 26 (42.6%) MIBC, 15 (24.6%) N+ and 5 (8.2%) metastatic (M). Of the 15 NMIBC 80% received initial BCG. Pts with nested bladder tumors at onset had worse PFS and OS (mPFS of 99.6 months (95% CI: 55.2-NR) and mOS of 107.3 months (95% CI: 71.6-NR) than those with nested bladder tumor at recurrence mPFS of NR (95% CI: 42.1-NR) and mOS 138.4 (95% CI: 51.7-NR). None of these differences were statistically significant. Patients with M and N+ stages showed a trend towards a worse prognosis than those with NMIBC and MIBC, with no statistically difference in mPFS and mOS between MIBC and NMIBC stages. According to treatment, the best mPFS and mOS were recorded among patients receiving RC and CT [mPFS 99.6 months (95% CI: 55.2-NR) and mOS of 107.3 months (95% CI: 107.3-NR)]. Those receiving BCG followed by RC group had a mPFS of 84.2 months (95% CI: 68.1-NR) and mOS of 85.9 months (95% CI: 71.6-NR) while those undergoing RC alone apparently had the worse mPFS of 42.1 months (95% CI: 42.1-NR) and mOS of 51.7 months (95% CI: 14.7.1-NR). None of these differences were statistically significant. Conclusions: This study represents the largest case series of nested bladder tumors. It suggests limited benefit from BCG treatment. Most patients had advance disease, most of NMIBC finally need CT. Diagnosis at recurrence and combination of RC and CT tend to better survivals. Analyses that are more detailed are ongoing to evaluate clinical benefits according to the different clinical features.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.743
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing treatment approaches in nested bladder tumors: A multicenter retrospective study.

Roberto Contieri, Francesco Soria, Alessandro Rametta, L. Da Pozzo et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

Optimizing treatment approaches in nested bladder tumors: A multicenter retrospective study.

Roberto Contieri, Francesco Soria, Alessandro Rametta, L. Da Pozzo, David D‘Andrea, Paolo Gontero, Marco Maruzzo, Marco Barella, Rosalba Miceli, Gennaro Musi, A. Di Marco, Giuseppe Procopio, Alessio Polymeropoulos, Francesco Alessandro Mistretta, Paolo Ambrosini, Nicola Nicolai, Rodolfo Hurle, Giovanni La Croce, Patrizia Giannatempo, A. Quistini
article en

Abstract

743 Background: Identifying optimal treatment strategies in nested bladder tumors is critical. This multicenter study aims at evaluating progression-free survival (PFS) end overall survival (OS) according to disease extent, presentation and treatment including Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), radical cystectomy (RC) and chemotherapy (CT). Methods: Data were collected from 61 patients with nested bladder tumors across 5 centers over a 10-year period (2013–2023). Patients were stratified according to 1) time of diagnosis of nested variant (disease onset Vs recurrence) 2) disease extent (NMIBC vs MIB, vs cN+ Vs M+) 3) treatment groups based on their initial treatment: ( BCG ± RC vs RC only Vs RC + CT). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess median PFS (mPFS) and median OS (mOS), while p-values <0.05 was used to determine statistical significance across groups. Results: The median follow-up was 30.6 months (95% CI: 16.4–40.6). At diagnosis 15 (24.6%) were NMIBC, 26 (42.6%) MIBC, 15 (24.6%) N+ and 5 (8.2%) metastatic (M). Of the 15 NMIBC 80% received initial BCG. Pts with nested bladder tumors at onset had worse PFS and OS (mPFS of 99.6 months (95% CI: 55.2-NR) and mOS of 107.3 months (95% CI: 71.6-NR) than those with nested bladder tumor at recurrence mPFS of NR (95% CI: 42.1-NR) and mOS 138.4 (95% CI: 51.7-NR). None of these differences were statistically significant. Patients with M and N+ stages showed a trend towards a worse prognosis than those with NMIBC and MIBC, with no statistically difference in mPFS and mOS between MIBC and NMIBC stages. According to treatment, the best mPFS and mOS were recorded among patients receiving RC and CT [mPFS 99.6 months (95% CI: 55.2-NR) and mOS of 107.3 months (95% CI: 107.3-NR)]. Those receiving BCG followed by RC group had a mPFS of 84.2 months (95% CI: 68.1-NR) and mOS of 85.9 months (95% CI: 71.6-NR) while those undergoing RC alone apparently had the worse mPFS of 42.1 months (95% CI: 42.1-NR) and mOS of 51.7 months (95% CI: 14.7.1-NR). None of these differences were statistically significant. Conclusions: This study represents the largest case series of nested bladder tumors. It suggests limited benefit from BCG treatment. Most patients had advance disease, most of NMIBC finally need CT. Diagnosis at recurrence and combination of RC and CT tend to better survivals. Analyses that are more detailed are ongoing to evaluate clinical benefits according to the different clinical features.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
Humanitas University (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT), Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII (IT), Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT), University of Turin (IT), European Institute of Oncology (IT), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.