A phase III randomized trial of eribulin (E) with gemcitabine vs standard of care (SOC) for patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) refractory to or ineligible for PD/PDL1 antibody (Ab): SWOG S1937—Updated design.

TPS887 Background: UC is the 2nd most common genitourinary cancer. Enfortumab vedotin (EV) + pembrolizumab became a SOC in 2023 in frontline mUC setting. There is not established standard of care for the subsequent lines of therapy limiting treatment options to platinum-based chemotherapy, docetaxel, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, or Sacituzumab govitecan monotherapy. Erdafitinib remains an option for pts with FGFR3 alterations. A phase I/II CTEP study of eribulin (E) for mUC established the activity of E with an objective response rate (ORR) of 37.5%, median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.1 months (mo), and median overall survival (OS) of 9.5 mo (N=150). A phase II CTEP study of gemcitabine-eribulin (GE) in cisplatin ineligible mUC showed an ORR of 50%, median OS of 11.9 mo, and median PFS of 5.3 mo (N=24). The most common Grade 3-4 toxicities included neutropenia (63%), anemia and fatigue (29% each). Pts with liver metastases benefited from therapy with an ORR of 71% (n=7) for GE vs. 24% for E (N=49). This trial has now been amended to account for first-line treatment changes and to include SG as a control arm option. In this amendment the eribulin alone arm was closed to simplify the design and reduce the sample size. Methods: This is an updated phase III, randomized trial comparing GE vs. SOC (SG, docetaxel, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine monotherapy). E is given at 1.4mg/m2 on day (D) 1 and 8 of a 21 D cycle. Gemcitabine is added to E at 1000 mg/m2 on D 1 and D 8. SOC follows approved dosing. There is no limit to the number/sequence of prior regimens. All pts must have: received systemic therapy with EV; received PD1/PDL1 Ab or be deemed ineligible for PD1/PDL1 Ab. The study seeks to find at least a 50% increase in the primary endpoint of OS (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.667). Secondary endpoints include ORR and PFS. This design has a power of 80% and a one-sided alpha of 0.05 to detect a HR=0.667. We require 92 pts in each arm for a total of 168 eligible pts. The amended and restructured study was approved in January of 2024. Funding: National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute grants U10CA180888, U10CA180819. Eribulin is provided by Eisai. Clinical trial information: NCT04579224 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.tps887
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A phase III randomized trial of eribulin (E) with gemcitabine vs standard of care (SOC) for patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) refractory to or ineligible for PD/PDL1 antibody (Ab): SWOG S1937—Updated design.

Rick Bangs, Siamak Daneshmand, Seth P. Lerner, Daniel Peter Petrylak et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
2.01
article

A phase III randomized trial of eribulin (E) with gemcitabine vs standard of care (SOC) for patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) refractory to or ineligible for PD/PDL1 antibody (Ab): SWOG S1937—Updated design.

Rick Bangs, Siamak Daneshmand, Seth P. Lerner, Daniel Peter Petrylak, Jason Robert Brown, Stephanie Berg, Sarmad Sadeghi, Primo N. Lara, Thomas W. Flaig, Samuel Callis, Darrell Nakagawa, Ian Murchie
article en
1 citations

Abstract

TPS887 Background: UC is the 2nd most common genitourinary cancer. Enfortumab vedotin (EV) + pembrolizumab became a SOC in 2023 in frontline mUC setting. There is not established standard of care for the subsequent lines of therapy limiting treatment options to platinum-based chemotherapy, docetaxel, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, or Sacituzumab govitecan monotherapy. Erdafitinib remains an option for pts with FGFR3 alterations. A phase I/II CTEP study of eribulin (E) for mUC established the activity of E with an objective response rate (ORR) of 37.5%, median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.1 months (mo), and median overall survival (OS) of 9.5 mo (N=150). A phase II CTEP study of gemcitabine-eribulin (GE) in cisplatin ineligible mUC showed an ORR of 50%, median OS of 11.9 mo, and median PFS of 5.3 mo (N=24). The most common Grade 3-4 toxicities included neutropenia (63%), anemia and fatigue (29% each). Pts with liver metastases benefited from therapy with an ORR of 71% (n=7) for GE vs. 24% for E (N=49). This trial has now been amended to account for first-line treatment changes and to include SG as a control arm option. In this amendment the eribulin alone arm was closed to simplify the design and reduce the sample size. Methods: This is an updated phase III, randomized trial comparing GE vs. SOC (SG, docetaxel, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine monotherapy). E is given at 1.4mg/m2 on day (D) 1 and 8 of a 21 D cycle. Gemcitabine is added to E at 1000 mg/m2 on D 1 and D 8. SOC follows approved dosing. There is no limit to the number/sequence of prior regimens. All pts must have: received systemic therapy with EV; received PD1/PDL1 Ab or be deemed ineligible for PD1/PDL1 Ab. The study seeks to find at least a 50% increase in the primary endpoint of OS (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.667). Secondary endpoints include ORR and PFS. This design has a power of 80% and a one-sided alpha of 0.05 to detect a HR=0.667. We require 92 pts in each arm for a total of 168 eligible pts. The amended and restructured study was approved in January of 2024. Funding: National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute grants U10CA180888, U10CA180819. Eribulin is provided by Eisai. Clinical trial information: NCT04579224 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
University of Southern California (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Yale University (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center (US), SWOG Cancer Research Network (US), UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), Case Western Reserve University (US), University of California, Davis (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.