Characterizing the clinical and genomic features of androgen indifferent prostate cancer.

222 Background: Androgen indifferent prostate cancer (AIPC) is increasingly common and particularly lethal. Data describing these tumors are sparse and AIPC remains a poorly understood malignancy. This study aims to characterize the clinical and genomic features of AIPC. Our work ultimately seeks to identify biomarkers with diagnostic and therapeutic potential. Methods: Utilizing the Oncology Research Information Exchange Network (ORIEN) database, we queried all prostate cancer (PC) patients, identified metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (MCRPC) samples, and aimed to enrich for tumors with features of AIPC using previously described characteristics. Our AIPC cohort included three subgroups: aggressive variant prostate cancer (AVPC) defined as having alterations in at least two of TP53, RB1, PTEN; neuroendocrine PC (NEPC) defined as small cell histology or NEPC signature score ≥ 0.25 (1); and double-negative PC (DNPC), defined as non-NEPC patients with low AR expression/AR signaling score. We compared clinical characteristics and genomic analysis of AIPC vs non-AIPC samples in patients who developed MCRPC. Clinical analysis was done using Wilcoxon rank sum test or Fisher's exact test. Gene expression analysis was performed using DESeq2 and GSEA. Results: Of 1,496 total PC patients available for analysis, we identified 323 (22%) as MCRPC. Of those, 39 (12%) met AIPC criteria (17 AVPC, 13 NEPC, 9 DNPC) and 284 (88%) were non-AIPC. Median age at diagnosis for AIPC was 62 years and 85% were white, compared to 62 years and 87% for non-AIPC. Fifty-seven percent of AIPC patients had ECOG ≥1 at diagnosis vs 16% of non-AIPC. Forty-three percent of AIPC patients had de novo metastatic disease vs 15% for non-AIPC (p=0.003). TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusions were found in a significantly higher proportion of AIPC samples vs non-AIPC (38.5% vs 16%, p=0.014). Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) did not differ between cohorts, but microsatellite instability scores (MSI) were significantly higher in AIPC (p=0.019). Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), we found that genes defining response to androgens and genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation were the most downregulated, whereas genes involved in epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), interferon response, and angiogenesis were significantly upregulated in AIPC vs non-AIPC samples. Conclusions: There was a significantly higher rate of de novo metastasis in the AIPC cohort. The downregulated androgen response and upregulated EMT pathways in AIPC suggest enrichment for androgen indifference with our methodology. Upregulated immune signaling and angiogenesis as well as higher MSI suggest opportunities for therapeutic investigation. Future directions include more focused in vitro and in vivo analysis to identify actionable targets. 1. Beltran H, et al. Nat Med . 2016;22(3):298-305. doi:10.1038/nm.4045.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.222
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterizing the clinical and genomic features of androgen indifferent prostate cancer.

Aakrosh Ratan, Eric A. Singer, Zin Myint, Sumati Gupta et al.
1 links
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

Characterizing the clinical and genomic features of androgen indifferent prostate cancer.

Aakrosh Ratan, Eric A. Singer, Zin Myint, Sumati Gupta, Saum Ghodoussipour, Jennifer King, Laura Graham, Robert J. Rounbehler, Bamidele Soji Oderinde, Bodour Salhia, Sean Q. Kern, Bryce M. Paschal, Yousef Zakharia, Paul Vincent Viscuse, Michelle L. Churchman, George Daniel Grass, Krzysztof Wierbiłowicz, Jack Masur, Adanma Ayanambakkam
article en

Abstract

222 Background: Androgen indifferent prostate cancer (AIPC) is increasingly common and particularly lethal. Data describing these tumors are sparse and AIPC remains a poorly understood malignancy. This study aims to characterize the clinical and genomic features of AIPC. Our work ultimately seeks to identify biomarkers with diagnostic and therapeutic potential. Methods: Utilizing the Oncology Research Information Exchange Network (ORIEN) database, we queried all prostate cancer (PC) patients, identified metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (MCRPC) samples, and aimed to enrich for tumors with features of AIPC using previously described characteristics. Our AIPC cohort included three subgroups: aggressive variant prostate cancer (AVPC) defined as having alterations in at least two of TP53, RB1, PTEN; neuroendocrine PC (NEPC) defined as small cell histology or NEPC signature score ≥ 0.25 (1); and double-negative PC (DNPC), defined as non-NEPC patients with low AR expression/AR signaling score. We compared clinical characteristics and genomic analysis of AIPC vs non-AIPC samples in patients who developed MCRPC. Clinical analysis was done using Wilcoxon rank sum test or Fisher's exact test. Gene expression analysis was performed using DESeq2 and GSEA. Results: Of 1,496 total PC patients available for analysis, we identified 323 (22%) as MCRPC. Of those, 39 (12%) met AIPC criteria (17 AVPC, 13 NEPC, 9 DNPC) and 284 (88%) were non-AIPC. Median age at diagnosis for AIPC was 62 years and 85% were white, compared to 62 years and 87% for non-AIPC. Fifty-seven percent of AIPC patients had ECOG ≥1 at diagnosis vs 16% of non-AIPC. Forty-three percent of AIPC patients had de novo metastatic disease vs 15% for non-AIPC (p=0.003). TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusions were found in a significantly higher proportion of AIPC samples vs non-AIPC (38.5% vs 16%, p=0.014). Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) did not differ between cohorts, but microsatellite instability scores (MSI) were significantly higher in AIPC (p=0.019). Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), we found that genes defining response to androgens and genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation were the most downregulated, whereas genes involved in epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), interferon response, and angiogenesis were significantly upregulated in AIPC vs non-AIPC samples. Conclusions: There was a significantly higher rate of de novo metastasis in the AIPC cohort. The downregulated androgen response and upregulated EMT pathways in AIPC suggest enrichment for androgen indifference with our methodology. Upregulated immune signaling and angiogenesis as well as higher MSI suggest opportunities for therapeutic investigation. Future directions include more focused in vitro and in vivo analysis to identify actionable targets. 1. Beltran H, et al. Nat Med . 2016;22(3):298-305. doi:10.1038/nm.4045.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), University of Southern California (US), University of Iowa (US), Indiana University Health (US), University of Kentucky (US), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US), University of Utah (US), Huntsman Cancer Institute (US), Moffitt Cancer Center (US), University of Colorado Cancer Center (US), Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rutgers Cancer Institute (US), University of Iowa Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US), University of Virginia (US), The Ohio State University (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.