Survival outcomes based on line of therapy and treatment trends with cabazitaxel in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

162 Background: Pts with mCRPC after progression on docetaxel and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs), have limited treatment options. Even with the changing landscape, cabazitaxel remains an effective approved therapy in this setting for these pts. However, real-world data on the efficacy and trends of cabazitaxel usage remain limited. Herein, we aimed to assess the survival outcomes and treatment patterns in pts with mCRPC receiving single-agent cabazitaxel in a real-world setting. Methods: This retrospective study utilized the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record (EHR) derived de-identified database. Eligibility: Diagnosis of mCRPC and receipt of single-agent cabazitaxel for the first time. Survival was calculated from the date pts received their first treatment with cabazitaxel. Time to next treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS) were summarized using Kaplan Meier survival estimates and its 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Among 24,105 pts with metastatic prostate cancer in the dataset, 1,315 pts diagnosed between 1/1/2013 and 1/26/2024 received single-agent cabazitaxel. Median age of pts was 73 years (IQR 67 – 78). The majority were non-Hispanic White (62%), treated in community practice (84%), had commercial insurance (81%), and received treatment in the third line or later (86%). The number of pts receiving cabazitaxel per year steadily increased from 2 (0.2%) in 2012 to a peak of 181 pts (14%) in 2021. Following the approval of lutetium-177-PSMA-617 (Lu) in 2022, cabazitaxel usage declined to 126 pts (9.6%) in 2023, indicating a shift in treatment patterns. The median TTNT was 4.7 months (95% CI, 4.4–5.0), and the median OS was 8.6 months (95% CI, 8.0–9.3) for pts treated with cabazitaxel. Median TTNT and OS by line of therapy are summarized (Table) . Conclusions: Despite proven OS benefit, the overall utilization of cabazitaxel is low in real-world pts in the US. The number of pts with mCRPC receiving cabazitaxel steadily increased until 2021 and declined following the approval of Lu in 2022, highlighting the evolving treatment landscape. Cabazitaxel continues to be an effective therapy regardless of line of therapy. Median TTNT and OS by line of therapy in pts with mCRPC receiving cabazitaxel. Line of therapy Number of pts, n (%) Median TTNT (mo) (95% CI) Median OS (mo) (95% CI) 2 183 (13.9) 5.7 (4.8, 6.3) 11 (9.5, 14) 3 378 (28.7) 4.3 (3.8, 4.7) 7.5 (6.6, 8.4) 4 430 (32.7) 4.5 (4.1, 4.8) 8.5 (7.5, 9.4) 5 219 (16.7) 5.1 (4.4, 5.9) 9.2 (8.0, 12) 6 71 (5.4) 5.1 (4.1, 5.9) 7.7 (5.9, 11) 7 22 (1.7) 6.8 (2.8, 12) 11 (8.2, 18) 8 6 (0.5) 4.9 (1.8, -) 6.3 (1.8, -) 9 6 (0.5) 4.2 (2.8, -) 14 (9.7, -)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.162
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Survival outcomes based on line of therapy and treatment trends with cabazitaxel in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

Vinay Mathew Thomas, Sumati Gupta, Yeonjung Jo, Benjamin Louis Maughan et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

Survival outcomes based on line of therapy and treatment trends with cabazitaxel in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

Vinay Mathew Thomas, Sumati Gupta, Yeonjung Jo, Benjamin Louis Maughan, Gliceida Galarza Fortuna, Umang Swami, Zeynep İrem Özay, Georges Gebrael, Beverly Chigarira, Nicolas Sayegh, Chadi Hage Chehade, Sheng Hu, Blake Nordblad, Ethan J. Anderson, Micah Ostrowski, Ayana Srivastava, Patrick Campbell, Neeraj Agarwal, Richard Ji, Diya Garg
article en

Abstract

162 Background: Pts with mCRPC after progression on docetaxel and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs), have limited treatment options. Even with the changing landscape, cabazitaxel remains an effective approved therapy in this setting for these pts. However, real-world data on the efficacy and trends of cabazitaxel usage remain limited. Herein, we aimed to assess the survival outcomes and treatment patterns in pts with mCRPC receiving single-agent cabazitaxel in a real-world setting. Methods: This retrospective study utilized the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record (EHR) derived de-identified database. Eligibility: Diagnosis of mCRPC and receipt of single-agent cabazitaxel for the first time. Survival was calculated from the date pts received their first treatment with cabazitaxel. Time to next treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS) were summarized using Kaplan Meier survival estimates and its 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Among 24,105 pts with metastatic prostate cancer in the dataset, 1,315 pts diagnosed between 1/1/2013 and 1/26/2024 received single-agent cabazitaxel. Median age of pts was 73 years (IQR 67 – 78). The majority were non-Hispanic White (62%), treated in community practice (84%), had commercial insurance (81%), and received treatment in the third line or later (86%). The number of pts receiving cabazitaxel per year steadily increased from 2 (0.2%) in 2012 to a peak of 181 pts (14%) in 2021. Following the approval of lutetium-177-PSMA-617 (Lu) in 2022, cabazitaxel usage declined to 126 pts (9.6%) in 2023, indicating a shift in treatment patterns. The median TTNT was 4.7 months (95% CI, 4.4–5.0), and the median OS was 8.6 months (95% CI, 8.0–9.3) for pts treated with cabazitaxel. Median TTNT and OS by line of therapy are summarized (Table) . Conclusions: Despite proven OS benefit, the overall utilization of cabazitaxel is low in real-world pts in the US. The number of pts with mCRPC receiving cabazitaxel steadily increased until 2021 and declined following the approval of Lu in 2022, highlighting the evolving treatment landscape. Cabazitaxel continues to be an effective therapy regardless of line of therapy. Median TTNT and OS by line of therapy in pts with mCRPC receiving cabazitaxel. Line of therapy Number of pts, n (%) Median TTNT (mo) (95% CI) Median OS (mo) (95% CI) 2 183 (13.9) 5.7 (4.8, 6.3) 11 (9.5, 14) 3 378 (28.7) 4.3 (3.8, 4.7) 7.5 (6.6, 8.4) 4 430 (32.7) 4.5 (4.1, 4.8) 8.5 (7.5, 9.4) 5 219 (16.7) 5.1 (4.4, 5.9) 9.2 (8.0, 12) 6 71 (5.4) 5.1 (4.1, 5.9) 7.7 (5.9, 11) 7 22 (1.7) 6.8 (2.8, 12) 11 (8.2, 18) 8 6 (0.5) 4.9 (1.8, -) 6.3 (1.8, -) 9 6 (0.5) 4.2 (2.8, -) 14 (9.7, -)

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US), Cornell University (US), University of Utah (US), New York Hospital Queens (US), Huntsman Cancer Institute (US), Presbyterian Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.