Disease management costs and healthcare resource utilization by progression health state among patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer.

714 Background: Significant disease management cost (DMC) burden and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) have been reported for patients with advanced bladder cancer; however, available data were outdated. We estimated the real-world DMC and HRU for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) receiving first-line (1L) treatment over time and by progression health state with more contemporary data. Methods: Patients aged ≥65 years with la/mUC receiving 1L treatment were identified from the SEER-Medicare linked database (2007–2019 [SEER]; 2007-2020 [Medicare]). Disease progression on 1L treatment was defined as the initiation of second-line treatment or the diagnosis of secondary malignancies. All-cause DMC and HRU were evaluated for all eligible patients during the pre-progression period, defined as the time from 1L initiation to date of progression or end of follow-up. For patients who progressed after 1L treatment, DMC and HRU were also assessed during the post-progression period, defined as the time from date of progression to end of follow-up. DMC were calculated as the sum of all-cause medical costs (inpatient [IP] + emergency room [ER] + outpatient [OP] costs + other medical costs not associated with these settings [e.g., skilled nursing facility]) and pharmacy (Rx) + drug administration costs, excluding the Rx and drug administration costs of la/mUC treatments. HRU included IP, ER, and OP visits, and use of radiation therapy and imaging. Costs and HRU were summarized on a per-patient per-month (PPPM) basis and stratified by time intervals: 0 to <12 months, 12 to <24 months, and 24+ months. All costs were inflated to 2023 US dollars. Results: Among the 1,145 patients with la/mUC who received 1L treatment, 872 (76.2%) progressed after 1L treatment. DMC (PPPM) post-progression were higher compared to pre-progression across all time intervals ($12,039 vs. $8,422 [0 to < 12 months], $5,994 vs. $3,119 [12 to <24 months], and $4,591 vs $1,743 [24+ months]) and decreased over successive time intervals for both pre- and post-progression health states. Similar findings in HRU indicate higher number of IP and OP visits in the post-progression state, except for OP visits during the 0 to <12 months interval. ER visits were similar in all but the 24+ months interval, where higher rates in the post-progression state were observed. Use of radiation therapy and imaging was higher in all intervals in the post-progression health state. Conclusions: DMC for la/mUC patients receiving 1L therapy were higher in the post-progression state compared with the pre-progression health state. The highest costs and HRU incurred within the first 12 months of 1L treatment initiation and disease progression. Contemporary time-varying DMC during progression health states is valuable to assess economic impact of new therapies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.714
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disease management costs and healthcare resource utilization by progression health state among patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer.

Aram Babcock, Reshma Shinde, James Signorovitch, Shujing Zhang et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
2.01
article

Disease management costs and healthcare resource utilization by progression health state among patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer.

Aram Babcock, Reshma Shinde, James Signorovitch, Shujing Zhang, Travis Wang, Yan Song, Qi Hua, Wei Gao, Yipeng Gao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

714 Background: Significant disease management cost (DMC) burden and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) have been reported for patients with advanced bladder cancer; however, available data were outdated. We estimated the real-world DMC and HRU for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) receiving first-line (1L) treatment over time and by progression health state with more contemporary data. Methods: Patients aged ≥65 years with la/mUC receiving 1L treatment were identified from the SEER-Medicare linked database (2007–2019 [SEER]; 2007-2020 [Medicare]). Disease progression on 1L treatment was defined as the initiation of second-line treatment or the diagnosis of secondary malignancies. All-cause DMC and HRU were evaluated for all eligible patients during the pre-progression period, defined as the time from 1L initiation to date of progression or end of follow-up. For patients who progressed after 1L treatment, DMC and HRU were also assessed during the post-progression period, defined as the time from date of progression to end of follow-up. DMC were calculated as the sum of all-cause medical costs (inpatient [IP] + emergency room [ER] + outpatient [OP] costs + other medical costs not associated with these settings [e.g., skilled nursing facility]) and pharmacy (Rx) + drug administration costs, excluding the Rx and drug administration costs of la/mUC treatments. HRU included IP, ER, and OP visits, and use of radiation therapy and imaging. Costs and HRU were summarized on a per-patient per-month (PPPM) basis and stratified by time intervals: 0 to <12 months, 12 to <24 months, and 24+ months. All costs were inflated to 2023 US dollars. Results: Among the 1,145 patients with la/mUC who received 1L treatment, 872 (76.2%) progressed after 1L treatment. DMC (PPPM) post-progression were higher compared to pre-progression across all time intervals ($12,039 vs. $8,422 [0 to < 12 months], $5,994 vs. $3,119 [12 to <24 months], and $4,591 vs $1,743 [24+ months]) and decreased over successive time intervals for both pre- and post-progression health states. Similar findings in HRU indicate higher number of IP and OP visits in the post-progression state, except for OP visits during the 0 to <12 months interval. ER visits were similar in all but the 24+ months interval, where higher rates in the post-progression state were observed. Use of radiation therapy and imaging was higher in all intervals in the post-progression health state. Conclusions: DMC for la/mUC patients receiving 1L therapy were higher in the post-progression state compared with the pre-progression health state. The highest costs and HRU incurred within the first 12 months of 1L treatment initiation and disease progression. Contemporary time-varying DMC during progression health states is valuable to assess economic impact of new therapies.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US), Analysis Group (United States) (US)
Merck
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.