Comorbidity burden and effectiveness of immunotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

509 Background: Comorbidities pose a challenge in the treatment of patients with cancer and present a barrier to inclusion in clinical trials. While the effect of comorbidities on the efficacy of immunotherapy (IO) has been studied in various malignancies, it remains unclear in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with IO-based combinations. Methods: Data from patients with mRCC receiving IO-based combinations (IO+IO or IO+anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)) as first-line treatment were collected from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and the Tom Baker Cancer Centre-University of Calgary. The comorbidity burden was assessed at baseline using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Patients were stratified into two groups: CCI-low (≤3) or CCI-high (>3), to predict overall survival (OS) through maximally selected rank statistics. The effect of CCI on OS and time-to-treatment failure (TTF) was assessed using multivariable Cox regression models. Results: Overall, 311 patients were included. The median age was 63 years (Q1-Q3: 58-69), and most patients had clear-cell mRCC (89.7%). A total of 167 (53.7%) and 144 (46.3%) patients were treated with IO+IO and IO+anti-VEGF, respectively. The most prevalent comorbidities were cardiovascular disease (20.2%) and diabetes (18.6%). In terms of CCI, 241 (77.5%) and 70 (22.5%) patients were categorized as CCI-low and CCI-high, respectively. Median follow-up was 40.8 months (Q1-Q3: 34.4-47.2) for OS. OS (aHR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.16-3.06, p=0.010) and TTF (aHR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.04-2.33, p=0.029) were worse in the CCI-high group (vs. CCI-low group) after adjusting for covariates (IMDC groups, age, Karnofsky score, histology, sarcomatoid features, sites of metastases, treatment type, and nephrectomy status). Rates of all adverse events (AEs) (66% vs. 65.5%) and immune-related AEs (42.1% vs. 35.9%) were comparable between the CCI-low and CCI-high groups, respectively. Conclusions: We report for the first time that comorbidity burden is an adverse prognostic factor in patients with mRCC undergoing IO-based combinations, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary care and tailored treatment strategies in this vulnerable patient population. Interestingly, despite the observed difference in survival outcomes, the incidence and profile of AEs were similar between the high- and low-comorbidity groups, suggesting that comorbidity burden does not substantially alter the safety profile of IO-based treatments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.509
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comorbidity burden and effectiveness of immunotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Chris Labaki, Martín Zarbá, Eddy Saad, Rashad Nawfal et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Comorbidity burden and effectiveness of immunotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Chris Labaki, Martín Zarbá, Eddy Saad, Rashad Nawfal, Razane El Hajj Chehade, J. Connor Wells, Daniel Yick Chin Heng, Renée Maria Saliby, Toni K. Choueiri, Karl Semaan, Marc Machaalani, Clara Steiner, Emre Yekedüz, Marc Eid
article en

Abstract

509 Background: Comorbidities pose a challenge in the treatment of patients with cancer and present a barrier to inclusion in clinical trials. While the effect of comorbidities on the efficacy of immunotherapy (IO) has been studied in various malignancies, it remains unclear in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with IO-based combinations. Methods: Data from patients with mRCC receiving IO-based combinations (IO+IO or IO+anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)) as first-line treatment were collected from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and the Tom Baker Cancer Centre-University of Calgary. The comorbidity burden was assessed at baseline using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Patients were stratified into two groups: CCI-low (≤3) or CCI-high (>3), to predict overall survival (OS) through maximally selected rank statistics. The effect of CCI on OS and time-to-treatment failure (TTF) was assessed using multivariable Cox regression models. Results: Overall, 311 patients were included. The median age was 63 years (Q1-Q3: 58-69), and most patients had clear-cell mRCC (89.7%). A total of 167 (53.7%) and 144 (46.3%) patients were treated with IO+IO and IO+anti-VEGF, respectively. The most prevalent comorbidities were cardiovascular disease (20.2%) and diabetes (18.6%). In terms of CCI, 241 (77.5%) and 70 (22.5%) patients were categorized as CCI-low and CCI-high, respectively. Median follow-up was 40.8 months (Q1-Q3: 34.4-47.2) for OS. OS (aHR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.16-3.06, p=0.010) and TTF (aHR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.04-2.33, p=0.029) were worse in the CCI-high group (vs. CCI-low group) after adjusting for covariates (IMDC groups, age, Karnofsky score, histology, sarcomatoid features, sites of metastases, treatment type, and nephrectomy status). Rates of all adverse events (AEs) (66% vs. 65.5%) and immune-related AEs (42.1% vs. 35.9%) were comparable between the CCI-low and CCI-high groups, respectively. Conclusions: We report for the first time that comorbidity burden is an adverse prognostic factor in patients with mRCC undergoing IO-based combinations, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary care and tailored treatment strategies in this vulnerable patient population. Interestingly, despite the observed difference in survival outcomes, the incidence and profile of AEs were similar between the high- and low-comorbidity groups, suggesting that comorbidity burden does not substantially alter the safety profile of IO-based treatments.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), University of Calgary (CA), Yale University (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.