Docetaxel rechallenge versus cabazitaxel in patients previously treated with docetaxel for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
154 Background: In 2004, docetaxel (DOC), a semi-synthetic taxane, received regulatory approval for mCRPC based on improved overall survival (OS). Cabazitaxel (CAB), a closely related analog of DOC, was approved in 2010 for mCRPC patients previously exposed to DOC. For patients previously treated with DOC, the relative benefits of docetaxel rechallenge (rDOC) versus a taxane switch to CAB are unknown. We aimed to evaluate the relative impact of rDOC versus CAB for patients who had previously received DOC for mCRPC. Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared outcomes of mCRPC patients in the nationwide VA healthcare system who received initial DOC, discontinued DOC for a reason other than disease progression, and later received rDOC or CAB after mCRPC diagnosis. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they received at least 3 cycles of DOC and at least 90 days later received a second course of DOC or CAB. The index date was the date of the start of the second course of taxane treatment. Time-to-event outcomes were evaluated from index date. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to control for potential confounders. Results: Between 1/2010 and 12/2023, a total of 669 patients (407 CAB, 262 rDOC) with median age 72, 29% Black, 27% CD, 39% CKD, 38% DM2, were included in final analysis. For the first instance of docetaxel, patients received a median of 6 (IQR: 4-10) cycles with a PSA50 = 20%, PSA90 = 3% and a median of 1 (IQR: 0-1) additional systemic treatment prior to subsequent taxane. At the time of the initiation of the second taxane, 73% of patients had bone and 18% visceral metastases and median initial PSA of 75 ng/mL. Compared to CAB, rDOC had higher PSA90 (11% vs 3%, p<0.001), longer OS (12.5 vs 9.6 months, p<0.001) and numerically longer time to next systemic treatment (16.4 vs 12.4 months, p=0.2), shorter time on treatment (2.1 vs. 2.6 months, p=0.56), and similar PSA50 (8% vs 9%, p=0.31). The use of platinum (9% vs 6%, p=0.15), immunotherapy (2 vs 1%, p=0.79) and PARP inhibitors (6% vs 5%, p=0.67) after the second instance of a taxane was not statistically different between groups. Conclusions: In this study, rDOC was associated with better survival and deeper response than cabazitaxel. The findings of this large-scale study provide guidance for making well-informed decisions about sequential use of taxanes for mCRPC treatment.
Authors
- June K. Corrigan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7514-0177)
- Clark DuMontier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2582-7816)
- David M. Nanus (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3514-2976)
- Stacy Loeb (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3933-9207)
- Karlynn E. Neu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3481-813X)
- Matthew B. Rettig (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7394-3056)
- Heather H. Cheng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1365-0702)
- Elliot H. Akama‐Garren (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1690-2055)
- Susan Halabi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4135-2777)
- Pedro Coelho Barata (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8890-2951)
- Jennifer La (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2266-0221)
- Martin William Schoen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6388-5553)
- Rhonda L. Bitting (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5253-0551)
- Nathanael R. Fillmore (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8058-3423)
- Matthew R. Cooperberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4339-6685)
- Channing Judith Paller (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3658-1858)
- Tanya Barauskas Dorff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5990-298X)
- Jean M. Hansen
- Chong‐Xian Pan
- John Culnan
Institutions
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Duke University (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- University of New England (US)
- New York Hospital Queens (US)
- VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- Presbyterian Hospital (US)
- City of Hope (US)
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center (US)
- Durham VA Medical Center (US)
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
- Saint Louis University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2025-02-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.154
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.52
Funders
- Office of Research and Development