Docetaxel rechallenge versus cabazitaxel in patients previously treated with docetaxel for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

154 Background: In 2004, docetaxel (DOC), a semi-synthetic taxane, received regulatory approval for mCRPC based on improved overall survival (OS). Cabazitaxel (CAB), a closely related analog of DOC, was approved in 2010 for mCRPC patients previously exposed to DOC. For patients previously treated with DOC, the relative benefits of docetaxel rechallenge (rDOC) versus a taxane switch to CAB are unknown. We aimed to evaluate the relative impact of rDOC versus CAB for patients who had previously received DOC for mCRPC. Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared outcomes of mCRPC patients in the nationwide VA healthcare system who received initial DOC, discontinued DOC for a reason other than disease progression, and later received rDOC or CAB after mCRPC diagnosis. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they received at least 3 cycles of DOC and at least 90 days later received a second course of DOC or CAB. The index date was the date of the start of the second course of taxane treatment. Time-to-event outcomes were evaluated from index date. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to control for potential confounders. Results: Between 1/2010 and 12/2023, a total of 669 patients (407 CAB, 262 rDOC) with median age 72, 29% Black, 27% CD, 39% CKD, 38% DM2, were included in final analysis. For the first instance of docetaxel, patients received a median of 6 (IQR: 4-10) cycles with a PSA50 = 20%, PSA90 = 3% and a median of 1 (IQR: 0-1) additional systemic treatment prior to subsequent taxane. At the time of the initiation of the second taxane, 73% of patients had bone and 18% visceral metastases and median initial PSA of 75 ng/mL. Compared to CAB, rDOC had higher PSA90 (11% vs 3%, p<0.001), longer OS (12.5 vs 9.6 months, p<0.001) and numerically longer time to next systemic treatment (16.4 vs 12.4 months, p=0.2), shorter time on treatment (2.1 vs. 2.6 months, p=0.56), and similar PSA50 (8% vs 9%, p=0.31). The use of platinum (9% vs 6%, p=0.15), immunotherapy (2 vs 1%, p=0.79) and PARP inhibitors (6% vs 5%, p=0.67) after the second instance of a taxane was not statistically different between groups. Conclusions: In this study, rDOC was associated with better survival and deeper response than cabazitaxel. The findings of this large-scale study provide guidance for making well-informed decisions about sequential use of taxanes for mCRPC treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.154
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Docetaxel rechallenge versus cabazitaxel in patients previously treated with docetaxel for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

June K. Corrigan, Clark DuMontier, David M. Nanus, Stacy Loeb et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
1.52
article

Docetaxel rechallenge versus cabazitaxel in patients previously treated with docetaxel for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

June K. Corrigan, Clark DuMontier, David M. Nanus, Stacy Loeb, Karlynn E. Neu, Matthew B. Rettig, Heather H. Cheng, Elliot H. Akama‐Garren, Susan Halabi, Pedro Coelho Barata, Jennifer La, Martin William Schoen, Rhonda L. Bitting, Nathanael R. Fillmore, Matthew R. Cooperberg, Channing Judith Paller, Tanya Barauskas Dorff, Jean M. Hansen, Chong‐Xian Pan, John Culnan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

154 Background: In 2004, docetaxel (DOC), a semi-synthetic taxane, received regulatory approval for mCRPC based on improved overall survival (OS). Cabazitaxel (CAB), a closely related analog of DOC, was approved in 2010 for mCRPC patients previously exposed to DOC. For patients previously treated with DOC, the relative benefits of docetaxel rechallenge (rDOC) versus a taxane switch to CAB are unknown. We aimed to evaluate the relative impact of rDOC versus CAB for patients who had previously received DOC for mCRPC. Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared outcomes of mCRPC patients in the nationwide VA healthcare system who received initial DOC, discontinued DOC for a reason other than disease progression, and later received rDOC or CAB after mCRPC diagnosis. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they received at least 3 cycles of DOC and at least 90 days later received a second course of DOC or CAB. The index date was the date of the start of the second course of taxane treatment. Time-to-event outcomes were evaluated from index date. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to control for potential confounders. Results: Between 1/2010 and 12/2023, a total of 669 patients (407 CAB, 262 rDOC) with median age 72, 29% Black, 27% CD, 39% CKD, 38% DM2, were included in final analysis. For the first instance of docetaxel, patients received a median of 6 (IQR: 4-10) cycles with a PSA50 = 20%, PSA90 = 3% and a median of 1 (IQR: 0-1) additional systemic treatment prior to subsequent taxane. At the time of the initiation of the second taxane, 73% of patients had bone and 18% visceral metastases and median initial PSA of 75 ng/mL. Compared to CAB, rDOC had higher PSA90 (11% vs 3%, p<0.001), longer OS (12.5 vs 9.6 months, p<0.001) and numerically longer time to next systemic treatment (16.4 vs 12.4 months, p=0.2), shorter time on treatment (2.1 vs. 2.6 months, p=0.56), and similar PSA50 (8% vs 9%, p=0.31). The use of platinum (9% vs 6%, p=0.15), immunotherapy (2 vs 1%, p=0.79) and PARP inhibitors (6% vs 5%, p=0.67) after the second instance of a taxane was not statistically different between groups. Conclusions: In this study, rDOC was associated with better survival and deeper response than cabazitaxel. The findings of this large-scale study provide guidance for making well-informed decisions about sequential use of taxanes for mCRPC treatment.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Duke University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Washington (US), Cornell University (US), University of New England (US), New York Hospital Queens (US), VA Boston Healthcare System (US), NYU Langone Health (US), Presbyterian Hospital (US), City of Hope (US), University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center (US), Durham VA Medical Center (US), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Saint Louis University (US)
Office of Research and Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.