Effective Communication of Underlying Research Philosophies Can Improve Circular Economy Research in the Foundation Industries

The drive to address environmental challenges in the Foundation Industries is leading to an ever greater, and more diverse, volume of Circular Economy related research. Despite increased expectations for research to achieve positive impact, authors do not always have the tools to effectively communicate to readers what their study’s underlying research philosophy is, regarding how knowledge will lead to impact. We propose terminology for authors to concisely communicate their approaches to knowledge generation (fundamental or applied) and route to impact (reformative or transformative). Reformative research does not seek to fundamentally disrupt or change the prevailing (or conventional) production systems, whereas transformative research does. We provide recommendations for how authors can effectively communicate their study’s research philosophy in an appropriate level of detail.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circular Economy
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55845/cpeo1326
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effective Communication of Underlying Research Philosophies Can Improve Circular Economy Research in the Foundation Industries

Alastair Marsh, Hisham Hafez
Circular Economy
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
article

Effective Communication of Underlying Research Philosophies Can Improve Circular Economy Research in the Foundation Industries

Alastair Marsh, Hisham Hafez
article en

Abstract

The drive to address environmental challenges in the Foundation Industries is leading to an ever greater, and more diverse, volume of Circular Economy related research. Despite increased expectations for research to achieve positive impact, authors do not always have the tools to effectively communicate to readers what their study’s underlying research philosophy is, regarding how knowledge will lead to impact. We propose terminology for authors to concisely communicate their approaches to knowledge generation (fundamental or applied) and route to impact (reformative or transformative). Reformative research does not seek to fundamentally disrupt or change the prevailing (or conventional) production systems, whereas transformative research does. We provide recommendations for how authors can effectively communicate their study’s research philosophy in an appropriate level of detail.

Circular EconomyVol. 3(1)
University of Leeds (GB), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.