Implementation and preliminary validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Radionuclide Therapy (FACT-RNT) in patients receiving radionuclide therapy for prostate cancer.

118 Background: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Radionuclide Therapy (FACT-RNT) is used in trials and clinical practice to monitor patient-reported RNT-relevant symptoms and toxicities in advanced metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients receiving RNT. This study examined FACT-RNT feasibility and preliminary validity for U.S. patients receiving RNT. Methods: Patients scheduled to start 177Lu-PSMA-617 for advanced mCRPC at Moffitt Cancer Center from October 2023 – March 2024 completed patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures before each cycle. PROs included previously validated measures of prostate cancer specific-symptoms (NFPSI-17) and physical function (Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment; PG-SGA) and the FACT-RNT, a 15-item measure of symptoms/toxicities with higher total scores (range: 0-60) indicating less symptom burden. Correlations between the FACT-RNT and other PROs were calculated. Results: Patients (N=17) were, on average, 69 years old (SD=11, range=43-90) at RNT cycle 1 and mostly non-Hispanic (76%) and White (82%). Gleason scores at diagnosis were 7-8 (30%) or 9-10 (71%). Patients had previously undergone surgery (35%), chemotherapy (94%), radiation (71%), hormone therapy (94%), targeted therapy (88%), and immunotherapy (29%). Fifteen patients (88%) received ≥2 RNT infusions; of these, 1 (6%) died and 1 (6%) discontinued RNT prior to cycle 2. Thirteen (87% of those with ≥2 infusions) completed the FACT-RNT at ≥2 cycles. Cycle 1 FACT-RNT total scores ranged from 31-58 (M=46.5, SD=8). The FACT-RNT was positively associated with symptoms as assessed by NFPSI-17 at cycles 1-3 ( p s≤.03) and negatively associated with physical function at cycles 1-2 ( p s≤.05). Conclusions: Preliminary results support FACT-RNT validity due to associations with validated PRO measures and the feasibility of FACT-RNT implementation in the U.S. The FACT-RNT may be helpful in clinical management and decision-making with RNT recipients. Future research will replicate and extend these findings in a larger longitudinal sample and examine validity with clinician-rated outcomes and RNT dosimetry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.118
Primary Topic
Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation and preliminary validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Radionuclide Therapy (FACT-RNT) in patients receiving radionuclide therapy for prostate cancer.

Brian D. Gonzalez, Lena M. Unterrainer, Ken Herrmann, Scott T. Tagawa et al.
1 links
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
article

Implementation and preliminary validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Radionuclide Therapy (FACT-RNT) in patients receiving radionuclide therapy for prostate cancer.

Brian D. Gonzalez, Lena M. Unterrainer, Ken Herrmann, Scott T. Tagawa, Laura B. Oswald, Jérémie Calais, David F Cella, Heather S.L. Jim, Xiaoyin Li, Adam P. Dicker, Johannes Czernin, Wolfgang P. Fendler, Michael S. Hofman, Ghassan El‐Haddad, Lisa M. Gudenkauf, Tuğçe Telli, Aasha I. Hoogland, D. Simon, Astrid Delker
article en

Abstract

118 Background: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Radionuclide Therapy (FACT-RNT) is used in trials and clinical practice to monitor patient-reported RNT-relevant symptoms and toxicities in advanced metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients receiving RNT. This study examined FACT-RNT feasibility and preliminary validity for U.S. patients receiving RNT. Methods: Patients scheduled to start 177Lu-PSMA-617 for advanced mCRPC at Moffitt Cancer Center from October 2023 – March 2024 completed patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures before each cycle. PROs included previously validated measures of prostate cancer specific-symptoms (NFPSI-17) and physical function (Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment; PG-SGA) and the FACT-RNT, a 15-item measure of symptoms/toxicities with higher total scores (range: 0-60) indicating less symptom burden. Correlations between the FACT-RNT and other PROs were calculated. Results: Patients (N=17) were, on average, 69 years old (SD=11, range=43-90) at RNT cycle 1 and mostly non-Hispanic (76%) and White (82%). Gleason scores at diagnosis were 7-8 (30%) or 9-10 (71%). Patients had previously undergone surgery (35%), chemotherapy (94%), radiation (71%), hormone therapy (94%), targeted therapy (88%), and immunotherapy (29%). Fifteen patients (88%) received ≥2 RNT infusions; of these, 1 (6%) died and 1 (6%) discontinued RNT prior to cycle 2. Thirteen (87% of those with ≥2 infusions) completed the FACT-RNT at ≥2 cycles. Cycle 1 FACT-RNT total scores ranged from 31-58 (M=46.5, SD=8). The FACT-RNT was positively associated with symptoms as assessed by NFPSI-17 at cycles 1-3 ( p s≤.03) and negatively associated with physical function at cycles 1-2 ( p s≤.05). Conclusions: Preliminary results support FACT-RNT validity due to associations with validated PRO measures and the feasibility of FACT-RNT implementation in the U.S. The FACT-RNT may be helpful in clinical management and decision-making with RNT recipients. Future research will replicate and extend these findings in a larger longitudinal sample and examine validity with clinician-rated outcomes and RNT dosimetry.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
Northwestern University (US), Thomas Jefferson University (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Cornell University (US), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), LMU Klinikum (DE), Moffitt Cancer Center (US), Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center (US), Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.