Implementation and preliminary validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Radionuclide Therapy (FACT-RNT) in patients receiving radionuclide therapy for prostate cancer.
118 Background: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Radionuclide Therapy (FACT-RNT) is used in trials and clinical practice to monitor patient-reported RNT-relevant symptoms and toxicities in advanced metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients receiving RNT. This study examined FACT-RNT feasibility and preliminary validity for U.S. patients receiving RNT. Methods: Patients scheduled to start 177Lu-PSMA-617 for advanced mCRPC at Moffitt Cancer Center from October 2023 – March 2024 completed patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures before each cycle. PROs included previously validated measures of prostate cancer specific-symptoms (NFPSI-17) and physical function (Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment; PG-SGA) and the FACT-RNT, a 15-item measure of symptoms/toxicities with higher total scores (range: 0-60) indicating less symptom burden. Correlations between the FACT-RNT and other PROs were calculated. Results: Patients (N=17) were, on average, 69 years old (SD=11, range=43-90) at RNT cycle 1 and mostly non-Hispanic (76%) and White (82%). Gleason scores at diagnosis were 7-8 (30%) or 9-10 (71%). Patients had previously undergone surgery (35%), chemotherapy (94%), radiation (71%), hormone therapy (94%), targeted therapy (88%), and immunotherapy (29%). Fifteen patients (88%) received ≥2 RNT infusions; of these, 1 (6%) died and 1 (6%) discontinued RNT prior to cycle 2. Thirteen (87% of those with ≥2 infusions) completed the FACT-RNT at ≥2 cycles. Cycle 1 FACT-RNT total scores ranged from 31-58 (M=46.5, SD=8). The FACT-RNT was positively associated with symptoms as assessed by NFPSI-17 at cycles 1-3 ( p s≤.03) and negatively associated with physical function at cycles 1-2 ( p s≤.05). Conclusions: Preliminary results support FACT-RNT validity due to associations with validated PRO measures and the feasibility of FACT-RNT implementation in the U.S. The FACT-RNT may be helpful in clinical management and decision-making with RNT recipients. Future research will replicate and extend these findings in a larger longitudinal sample and examine validity with clinician-rated outcomes and RNT dosimetry.
Authors
- Brian D. Gonzalez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5108-5735)
- Lena M. Unterrainer
- Ken Herrmann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9662-7259)
- Scott T. Tagawa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2777-8587)
- Laura B. Oswald (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6281-2512)
- Jérémie Calais (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8839-4379)
- David F Cella (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9881-4541)
- Heather S.L. Jim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7353-3711)
- Xiaoyin Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8028-8910)
- Adam P. Dicker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0733-3337)
- Johannes Czernin
- Wolfgang P. Fendler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5106-3584)
- Michael S. Hofman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8622-159X)
- Ghassan El‐Haddad (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1149-263X)
- Lisa M. Gudenkauf (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6825-5921)
- Tuğçe Telli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9939-282X)
- Aasha I. Hoogland (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8691-8132)
- D. Simon
- Astrid Delker
Institutions
- Northwestern University (US)
- Thomas Jefferson University (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU)
- LMU Klinikum (DE)
- Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center (US)
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DE)
- University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2025-02-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.118
- Primary Topic
- Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00