Real-world analysis of the efficacy and safety of enfortumab vedotin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study.

712 Background: We investigated the efficacy and safety enfortumab vedotin (EV) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in real-world practice. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 419 patients treated for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma between April 2004 to April 2024. The patients were categorized into the following three groups: 87 patients who underwent first-line chemotherapy and sequential chemotherapy alone (chemo-alone group), 217 patients who underwent maintenance immunotherapy or second-line immunotherapy after first-line chemotherapy (chemo-ICI group) and 115 patients who were treated with EV after first-line chemotherapy and immunotherapy (chemo-ICI-EV group). The primary outcome was the comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) of first-line therapy and overall survival (OS) from first-line therapy between the three treatment groups. Secondary outcomes included the efficacy and safety in the chemo-ICI-EV group focusing on skin adverse events (AEs). Results: The OS from first-line therapy was significantly longer in the chemo-ICI-EV group than that in the other groups. There was no significant difference in the first-line PFS of first-line therapy between the three groups. A multivariable Cox regression analysis showed the administration of EV was significantly associated with prolonged OS. Skin AEs were observed in 69 (60%) as a major adverse event. The PFS and OS in the patients with skin AEs was significantly longer than in the patients without skin AEs despite the reduced dose of EV. A multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that skin AEs were significantly associated with prolonged RFS and OS. Conclusions: The administration of EV significantly improved oncological outcomes in the real-world practice. Dose adjustment of EV may be key for long-term use and oncological outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.712
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world analysis of the efficacy and safety of enfortumab vedotin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study.

Shingo Hatakeyama, Tomonori Habuchi, Mizuki Kobayashi, Hayato Yamamoto et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

Real-world analysis of the efficacy and safety of enfortumab vedotin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study.

Shingo Hatakeyama, Tomonori Habuchi, Mizuki Kobayashi, Hayato Yamamoto, Kazuyuki Numakura, Kai Ozaki, Takahiro Yoneyama, Yuya Sekine, Chikara Οhyama, Satoshi Sato, Kanami Mori
article en

Abstract

712 Background: We investigated the efficacy and safety enfortumab vedotin (EV) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in real-world practice. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 419 patients treated for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma between April 2004 to April 2024. The patients were categorized into the following three groups: 87 patients who underwent first-line chemotherapy and sequential chemotherapy alone (chemo-alone group), 217 patients who underwent maintenance immunotherapy or second-line immunotherapy after first-line chemotherapy (chemo-ICI group) and 115 patients who were treated with EV after first-line chemotherapy and immunotherapy (chemo-ICI-EV group). The primary outcome was the comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) of first-line therapy and overall survival (OS) from first-line therapy between the three treatment groups. Secondary outcomes included the efficacy and safety in the chemo-ICI-EV group focusing on skin adverse events (AEs). Results: The OS from first-line therapy was significantly longer in the chemo-ICI-EV group than that in the other groups. There was no significant difference in the first-line PFS of first-line therapy between the three groups. A multivariable Cox regression analysis showed the administration of EV was significantly associated with prolonged OS. Skin AEs were observed in 69 (60%) as a major adverse event. The PFS and OS in the patients with skin AEs was significantly longer than in the patients without skin AEs despite the reduced dose of EV. A multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that skin AEs were significantly associated with prolonged RFS and OS. Conclusions: The administration of EV significantly improved oncological outcomes in the real-world practice. Dose adjustment of EV may be key for long-term use and oncological outcomes.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
Hirosaki University (JP), Akita University (JP), Hakodate Central General Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.