Racial differences in active surveillance intensity and overtreatment in men with prostate cancer.

316 Background: Marginalized communities in cancer care are often characterized by lower healthcare utilization. In prostate cancer, however, utilization may have mixed effects on quality, particularly in the Medicare population where non-cancer health risks are more prevalent. In this context, we examined racial differences in active surveillance intensity (i.e. confirmatory testing) and potential overtreatment, two key measures of prostate cancer care quality. Methods: Using a 20% national sample of Traditional Medicare beneficiaries, we identified men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer from 2014 to 2019. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between race (White, Black, or other) and receipt of a confirmatory test (prostate biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging, or genomic testing) within one year of diagnosis among men on active surveillance. We created a subset of patients with significant comorbidities to assess potential overtreatment (i.e., treatment among patients with >50% estimated non-cancer mortality in five years). Results: We identified 41,092 men meeting inclusion criteria. On adjusted analysis, Black men (OR=0.75; 95%CI: 0.62-0.92, p=0.01) had lower odds of receiving a confirmatory test compared to White men. Among men at risk of overtreatment, Black men (OR=0.86; 95%CI: 0.77-0.97, p=0.01) were less likely to receive treatment compared to White men. Further, all patients, regardless of race, had a predicted probability <50% of receiving a confirmatory test within one year of diagnosis (Table). Conclusions: Our study highlights racial differences in two measures of prostate cancer care, receipt of a confirmatory test and overtreatment. We demonstrated that Black men have lower odds of receiving a confirmatory test. This stands to disproportionately affect Black men, given that they present with higher risk tumors compared to other racial groups. Conversely, Black men have lower odds of being overtreated when compared with White men, suggesting that lower utilization may shield them from potential overtreatment and its related morbidity. As a result, policy efforts aiming to reduce disparities may be most impactful by prioritizing clinical contexts where utilization and access are tightly aligned with care quality. Predicted probabilities for confirmatory testing and overtreatment. White Black Other Confirmatory Testing 43% 37%* 46% Overtreatment 50% 43%* 46%* Adjusted for socioeconomic status tertile, Charlson Comorbidity Index, age, rurality, and year of diagnosis. *Indicates p<0.05.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.316
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racial differences in active surveillance intensity and overtreatment in men with prostate cancer.

Brent K. Hollenbeck, Dawson Hill, Christopher Dall, Addison Shay et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Racial differences in active surveillance intensity and overtreatment in men with prostate cancer.

Brent K. Hollenbeck, Dawson Hill, Christopher Dall, Addison Shay, Paula Guro, Sarah Leick, Vahakn B. Shahinian, Mary Oerline, Preeti Chachlani, Samuel R. Kaufman, Arnav Srivastava
article en

Abstract

316 Background: Marginalized communities in cancer care are often characterized by lower healthcare utilization. In prostate cancer, however, utilization may have mixed effects on quality, particularly in the Medicare population where non-cancer health risks are more prevalent. In this context, we examined racial differences in active surveillance intensity (i.e. confirmatory testing) and potential overtreatment, two key measures of prostate cancer care quality. Methods: Using a 20% national sample of Traditional Medicare beneficiaries, we identified men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer from 2014 to 2019. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between race (White, Black, or other) and receipt of a confirmatory test (prostate biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging, or genomic testing) within one year of diagnosis among men on active surveillance. We created a subset of patients with significant comorbidities to assess potential overtreatment (i.e., treatment among patients with >50% estimated non-cancer mortality in five years). Results: We identified 41,092 men meeting inclusion criteria. On adjusted analysis, Black men (OR=0.75; 95%CI: 0.62-0.92, p=0.01) had lower odds of receiving a confirmatory test compared to White men. Among men at risk of overtreatment, Black men (OR=0.86; 95%CI: 0.77-0.97, p=0.01) were less likely to receive treatment compared to White men. Further, all patients, regardless of race, had a predicted probability <50% of receiving a confirmatory test within one year of diagnosis (Table). Conclusions: Our study highlights racial differences in two measures of prostate cancer care, receipt of a confirmatory test and overtreatment. We demonstrated that Black men have lower odds of receiving a confirmatory test. This stands to disproportionately affect Black men, given that they present with higher risk tumors compared to other racial groups. Conversely, Black men have lower odds of being overtreated when compared with White men, suggesting that lower utilization may shield them from potential overtreatment and its related morbidity. As a result, policy efforts aiming to reduce disparities may be most impactful by prioritizing clinical contexts where utilization and access are tightly aligned with care quality. Predicted probabilities for confirmatory testing and overtreatment. White Black Other Confirmatory Testing 43% 37%* 46% Overtreatment 50% 43%* 46%* Adjusted for socioeconomic status tertile, Charlson Comorbidity Index, age, rurality, and year of diagnosis. *Indicates p<0.05.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
University of Michigan (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.