The nature of progression on long term active surveillance for confirmed Gleason grade group 1 prostate cancer in the modern era.

360 Background: Gleason Grade Group 1 (GG1), or Gleason 3+3, prostate cancer (PCa), are considered low-risk, and unlikely to lead to major adverse outcomes such as metastasis or PCa-specific mortality. However, initial diagnoses of GG1 can upgrade over time, and balancing the need for monitoring with concerns about overtreatment of GG1 has led to the emergence of active surveillance (AS) as the standard of care for GG1 PCa. There has been a recent controversy regarding whether the label of cancer should be removed from GG1 tumors; proponents argue that such a change would dramatically reduce patient anxiety and overtreatment of GG1 PCa, while detractors argue that this could lead to failure to follow such patients and a missed opportunity for cure in those who might benefit. We sought to describe the nature of progression of GG1 disease in the modern era for confirmed GG1 patients after multiparametric prostate MRI-targeted biopsy in a large, well-annotated AS cohort. Methods: The Urologic Outcomes Database (UODB) at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) was queried for men with cT1-2N0/xM0/x, PSA <20ng/ml, GG1 PCa with ≤33% biopsy core positivity with a minimum of 2 biopsies on AS with at least one multiparametric prostate MRI-targeted biopsy. Clinicodemographic factors and pathology data at diagnosis and at subsequent biopsies were obtained. Outcomes were any upgrade (≥GG2), major upgrade (≥GG3), increase in percentage of positive cores to >33%, and progression to active treatment. Life-table estimates and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to describe major outcomes variables. Results: 803 men met inclusion criteria. Median (IQR) follow-up for the cohort was 114 (75-157) months. CAPRA score at diagnosis was low risk and intermediate risk in 749 (93%) and 54 (7%) patients, respectively. Median (IQR) PSA at diagnosis, any upgrade, and major upgrade was 5.0 (3.8-6.7) ng/mL, 6.9 (4.5-9.9) ng/mL, and 7.8 (5.5-11.8) ng/mL, respectively. At 5 and 10 years, any upgrade rate was 28% and 61%, major upgrade rate was 5% and 17%, rate of increase in core positivity from ≤33% to >33% was 22% and 37%, and active treatment rate was 15% and 33%, respectively. Patients with both upgrade to GG2 and increased core positivity and major upgrade were more likely to progress to active treatment compared to patients with either upgrade to GG2 or increased core positivity alone (Log-rank p<0.01). Conclusions: Men with confirmed GG1 PCa on AS with at least one MRI-targeted biopsy have high rates of minor upgrade, moderate rates of increased core positivity and progression to active treatment, and low rates of major upgrade on subsequent biopsy, and are more likely to progress to treatment if they experience major upgrade or both upgrade to GG2 and increase in core positivity. These findings highlight heterogeneity of outcomes in patients with confirmed GG1 PCa in the modern era and highlights the critical need for continued monitoring with AS in such patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.360
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The nature of progression on long term active surveillance for confirmed Gleason grade group 1 prostate cancer in the modern era.

Lufan Wang, Katsuto Shinohara, Chien‐Kuang Cornelia Ding, Kevin Shee et al.
1 links
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

The nature of progression on long term active surveillance for confirmed Gleason grade group 1 prostate cancer in the modern era.

Lufan Wang, Katsuto Shinohara, Chien‐Kuang Cornelia Ding, Kevin Shee, Janet E. Cowan, Samuel L. Washington, Matthew R. Cooperberg, Hao G. Nguyen, Peter R. Carroll
article en

Abstract

360 Background: Gleason Grade Group 1 (GG1), or Gleason 3+3, prostate cancer (PCa), are considered low-risk, and unlikely to lead to major adverse outcomes such as metastasis or PCa-specific mortality. However, initial diagnoses of GG1 can upgrade over time, and balancing the need for monitoring with concerns about overtreatment of GG1 has led to the emergence of active surveillance (AS) as the standard of care for GG1 PCa. There has been a recent controversy regarding whether the label of cancer should be removed from GG1 tumors; proponents argue that such a change would dramatically reduce patient anxiety and overtreatment of GG1 PCa, while detractors argue that this could lead to failure to follow such patients and a missed opportunity for cure in those who might benefit. We sought to describe the nature of progression of GG1 disease in the modern era for confirmed GG1 patients after multiparametric prostate MRI-targeted biopsy in a large, well-annotated AS cohort. Methods: The Urologic Outcomes Database (UODB) at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) was queried for men with cT1-2N0/xM0/x, PSA <20ng/ml, GG1 PCa with ≤33% biopsy core positivity with a minimum of 2 biopsies on AS with at least one multiparametric prostate MRI-targeted biopsy. Clinicodemographic factors and pathology data at diagnosis and at subsequent biopsies were obtained. Outcomes were any upgrade (≥GG2), major upgrade (≥GG3), increase in percentage of positive cores to >33%, and progression to active treatment. Life-table estimates and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to describe major outcomes variables. Results: 803 men met inclusion criteria. Median (IQR) follow-up for the cohort was 114 (75-157) months. CAPRA score at diagnosis was low risk and intermediate risk in 749 (93%) and 54 (7%) patients, respectively. Median (IQR) PSA at diagnosis, any upgrade, and major upgrade was 5.0 (3.8-6.7) ng/mL, 6.9 (4.5-9.9) ng/mL, and 7.8 (5.5-11.8) ng/mL, respectively. At 5 and 10 years, any upgrade rate was 28% and 61%, major upgrade rate was 5% and 17%, rate of increase in core positivity from ≤33% to >33% was 22% and 37%, and active treatment rate was 15% and 33%, respectively. Patients with both upgrade to GG2 and increased core positivity and major upgrade were more likely to progress to active treatment compared to patients with either upgrade to GG2 or increased core positivity alone (Log-rank p<0.01). Conclusions: Men with confirmed GG1 PCa on AS with at least one MRI-targeted biopsy have high rates of minor upgrade, moderate rates of increased core positivity and progression to active treatment, and low rates of major upgrade on subsequent biopsy, and are more likely to progress to treatment if they experience major upgrade or both upgrade to GG2 and increase in core positivity. These findings highlight heterogeneity of outcomes in patients with confirmed GG1 PCa in the modern era and highlights the critical need for continued monitoring with AS in such patients.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.