NEO-BLAST: Neoadjuvant therapy for bladder cancer followed by active surveillance vs treatment.

TPS890 Background: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Approximately 35-40% of patients have no residual cancer at the time of surgery, suggesting that these patients could potentially avoid definitive bladder treatments (DBT), including RC or trimodal therapy (TMT). However, the current clinical tools used to detect residual disease prior to cystectomy are inadequate. The question remains whether patients with complete response (CR) require DBT or if active surveillance (AS) could be a safe alternative. The NEO-BLAST trial investigates whether a combination of bladder MRI, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), urinary tumor DNA (utDNA) and transurethral bladder tumor resection (TURBT) can accurately identify MIBC patients with a clinical CR (cCR) following NAT, and whether AS is non-inferior to standard of care (SOC) in those who achieved cCR. Methods: This is a multicenter, phase II/III, non-inferiority open-label clinical trial that will randomize patients with MIBC who achieve cCR after NAT to AS versus SOC DBT, including either RC or trimodal therapy (TMT) (NCT06537154). The primary endpoint is feasibility of randomization for the phase II pilot-RCT, and metastasis-free survival (MFS) at two years for the phase III. Eligible patients will be adults with non-metastatic MIBC (≥T2, N0M0) who are candidates to SOC NAT followed by DBT as per the current practice. After enrolment, ctDNA and utDNA will be collected. Only participants who complete SOC NAT will then undergo a comprehensive clinical restaging process, including repeat ctDNA and utDNA, bladder mpMRI, urine cytology, and TURBT with template biopsies. Participants meeting criteria for cCR, defined as negative ctDNA, utDNA, MRI, and TURBT, will be randomized to either AS-arm or DBT-arm, while those without cCR will receive SOC. Participants will be monitored with cystoscopy and urine cytology (if bladder in situ) every three months for 2 years, along with ctDNA and imaging at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The pilot-RCT will plan to enrol 72 patients, and if 25% is found to have cCR and accept to be randomized, the trial will be considered feasible. Assuming a 5% event rate at 2 years (MFS) in both groups and a type I error of 5% (1-sided), 78 per group will provide 80% power to reject the hypothesis of inferiority. We anticipate enrolling 688 patients for the phase 3 to have a total of 172 patients with cCR randomized, assuming 10% lost to follow-up. An independent Data Monitoring Committee will oversee safety and efficacy throughout the trial. Clinical trial information: NCT06537154 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.tps890
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NEO-BLAST: Neoadjuvant therapy for bladder cancer followed by active surveillance vs treatment.

Marie-Pier St-Laurent, Silvia D. Chang, Peter C. Black, Ren Yuan et al.
4 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
8.03
article

NEO-BLAST: Neoadjuvant therapy for bladder cancer followed by active surveillance vs treatment.

Marie-Pier St-Laurent, Silvia D. Chang, Peter C. Black, Ren Yuan, Bernhard J. Eigl
article en
4 citations

Abstract

TPS890 Background: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Approximately 35-40% of patients have no residual cancer at the time of surgery, suggesting that these patients could potentially avoid definitive bladder treatments (DBT), including RC or trimodal therapy (TMT). However, the current clinical tools used to detect residual disease prior to cystectomy are inadequate. The question remains whether patients with complete response (CR) require DBT or if active surveillance (AS) could be a safe alternative. The NEO-BLAST trial investigates whether a combination of bladder MRI, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), urinary tumor DNA (utDNA) and transurethral bladder tumor resection (TURBT) can accurately identify MIBC patients with a clinical CR (cCR) following NAT, and whether AS is non-inferior to standard of care (SOC) in those who achieved cCR. Methods: This is a multicenter, phase II/III, non-inferiority open-label clinical trial that will randomize patients with MIBC who achieve cCR after NAT to AS versus SOC DBT, including either RC or trimodal therapy (TMT) (NCT06537154). The primary endpoint is feasibility of randomization for the phase II pilot-RCT, and metastasis-free survival (MFS) at two years for the phase III. Eligible patients will be adults with non-metastatic MIBC (≥T2, N0M0) who are candidates to SOC NAT followed by DBT as per the current practice. After enrolment, ctDNA and utDNA will be collected. Only participants who complete SOC NAT will then undergo a comprehensive clinical restaging process, including repeat ctDNA and utDNA, bladder mpMRI, urine cytology, and TURBT with template biopsies. Participants meeting criteria for cCR, defined as negative ctDNA, utDNA, MRI, and TURBT, will be randomized to either AS-arm or DBT-arm, while those without cCR will receive SOC. Participants will be monitored with cystoscopy and urine cytology (if bladder in situ) every three months for 2 years, along with ctDNA and imaging at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The pilot-RCT will plan to enrol 72 patients, and if 25% is found to have cCR and accept to be randomized, the trial will be considered feasible. Assuming a 5% event rate at 2 years (MFS) in both groups and a type I error of 5% (1-sided), 78 per group will provide 80% power to reject the hypothesis of inferiority. We anticipate enrolling 688 patients for the phase 3 to have a total of 172 patients with cCR randomized, assuming 10% lost to follow-up. An independent Data Monitoring Committee will oversee safety and efficacy throughout the trial. Clinical trial information: NCT06537154 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
BC Cancer Agency (CA), University of British Columbia (CA)
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
8.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.