Repositioning middle powers in international hierarchies of status and order

This article develops a framework for theorising middle power identity formation. It contends that middle power identity formation has frequently been driven by both the pursuit of elevated positions within hierarchies of status, and by the construction, (re)organisation and navigation of hierarchies of order. The role of three essential concepts driving middle power identity formation are highlighted: middle power identity entrepreneurs, middle power identity narratives and periods of middle power identity ignition. Through application to the case of South Korea, it finds that structural change and elite activism combined to form a new middle power identity from 1987 to 2013. This identity change was driven by attempts to reposition the country in international society’s status community; while simultaneously renegotiating the terms of the country’s subordination to the US and attempting to initiate superordinate roles over North Korea and Southeast Asia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Relations
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178251319723
Citations
3
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Repositioning middle powers in international hierarchies of status and order

Alexander M. Hynd
3 citations
International Relations
European Union Policy and Governance
25.57
article

Repositioning middle powers in international hierarchies of status and order

Alexander M. Hynd
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article develops a framework for theorising middle power identity formation. It contends that middle power identity formation has frequently been driven by both the pursuit of elevated positions within hierarchies of status, and by the construction, (re)organisation and navigation of hierarchies of order. The role of three essential concepts driving middle power identity formation are highlighted: middle power identity entrepreneurs, middle power identity narratives and periods of middle power identity ignition. Through application to the case of South Korea, it finds that structural change and elite activism combined to form a new middle power identity from 1987 to 2013. This identity change was driven by attempts to reposition the country in international society’s status community; while simultaneously renegotiating the terms of the country’s subordination to the US and attempting to initiate superordinate roles over North Korea and Southeast Asia.

International Relations
The University of Melbourne (AU), East Asia Institute (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
European Union Policy and Governance
25.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.