Radiographic progression without PSA progression in advanced prostate cancer patients.

213 Background: Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors (ARPIs) are frequently combined with Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) to treat prostate cancer patients (pts) with castration sensitive (CSPC) or castration resistant (CRPC) disease. We sought to characterize pts who experienced radiographic progression without PSA progression (R-PD) while under treatment with ADT with or without an ARPI. Methods: We undertook a retrospective analysis of two phase 3 trials testing apalutamide (Apa) + ADT vs Placebo (Pbo) + ADT: TITAN (NCT02489318) in pts with metastatic CSPC (mCSPC) and SPARTAN (NCT01946204) in pts with non-metastatic CRPC (nmCRPC). We compared pts with R-PD with pts who experienced PSA progression before or concurrently with radiographic progression (PSA-PD). Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional-hazard models were used to estimate time-to-event and hazard ratios. Results: The distribution of types of progression, and location of R-PD by study is shown in the table. Pts with R-PD had shorter overall survival (OS) compared with PSA-PD pts in both studies (median OS R-PD vs PSA-PD: 22.9 m vs 37.4 m in TITAN; 49.8 m vs 53.7 m in SPARTAN). Compared with Pbo, Apa delayed the time to R-PD in both studies (HR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.73 in TITAN; HR 0.17, 95% CI: 0.1 to 0.28 in SPARTAN). No pre-treatment variables predictive of R-PD vs PSA-PD were identified; transcriptional profile analysis is ongoing. Conclusions: Radiographic progression in the absence of PSA progression is not uncommon amongst patients with advanced prostate cancer, and carries a poor prognosis. The addition of Apa prolongs the median time to R-PD. Our findings underscore the importance of monitoring these pts with imaging, independent of PSA dynamics. The impaired survival of R-PD pts warrants evaluation of new therapeutic approaches for these pts. OVERALL TITAN (mCSPC; n=1052) SPARTAN (nmCRPC; n=1207) % pts with R-PD 12.4% 10.4% % pts with PSA-PD 41.2% 45.4% Sites of progression in R-PD pts (% of randomized pts) Bone only 6.3% 1% Non-bone 6% 8.8% Both 0.1% 0%

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.213
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radiographic progression without PSA progression in advanced prostate cancer patients.

Kristin M. Shotts, Kim N. Chi, Eric Jay Small, Suneel Mundle et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1.52
article

Radiographic progression without PSA progression in advanced prostate cancer patients.

Kristin M. Shotts, Kim N. Chi, Eric Jay Small, Suneel Mundle, Angela Lopez‐Gitlitz, Amitabha Bhaumik, Ruchi Chaudhary, Sharon McCarthy, Neeraj Agarwal
article en
1 citations

Abstract

213 Background: Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors (ARPIs) are frequently combined with Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) to treat prostate cancer patients (pts) with castration sensitive (CSPC) or castration resistant (CRPC) disease. We sought to characterize pts who experienced radiographic progression without PSA progression (R-PD) while under treatment with ADT with or without an ARPI. Methods: We undertook a retrospective analysis of two phase 3 trials testing apalutamide (Apa) + ADT vs Placebo (Pbo) + ADT: TITAN (NCT02489318) in pts with metastatic CSPC (mCSPC) and SPARTAN (NCT01946204) in pts with non-metastatic CRPC (nmCRPC). We compared pts with R-PD with pts who experienced PSA progression before or concurrently with radiographic progression (PSA-PD). Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional-hazard models were used to estimate time-to-event and hazard ratios. Results: The distribution of types of progression, and location of R-PD by study is shown in the table. Pts with R-PD had shorter overall survival (OS) compared with PSA-PD pts in both studies (median OS R-PD vs PSA-PD: 22.9 m vs 37.4 m in TITAN; 49.8 m vs 53.7 m in SPARTAN). Compared with Pbo, Apa delayed the time to R-PD in both studies (HR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.73 in TITAN; HR 0.17, 95% CI: 0.1 to 0.28 in SPARTAN). No pre-treatment variables predictive of R-PD vs PSA-PD were identified; transcriptional profile analysis is ongoing. Conclusions: Radiographic progression in the absence of PSA progression is not uncommon amongst patients with advanced prostate cancer, and carries a poor prognosis. The addition of Apa prolongs the median time to R-PD. Our findings underscore the importance of monitoring these pts with imaging, independent of PSA dynamics. The impaired survival of R-PD pts warrants evaluation of new therapeutic approaches for these pts. OVERALL TITAN (mCSPC; n=1052) SPARTAN (nmCRPC; n=1207) % pts with R-PD 12.4% 10.4% % pts with PSA-PD 41.2% 45.4% Sites of progression in R-PD pts (% of randomized pts) Bone only 6.3% 1% Non-bone 6% 8.8% Both 0.1% 0%

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US), University of British Columbia (CA), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Utah (US), Huntsman Cancer Institute (US), Janssen (United States) (US), UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.