Where you place the stakes matter: examining the relationship between test-based accountability and shadow education

Accountability is a nearly ubiquitous part of education systems around the world. However, often missing is an explicit discussion on who the stakes of accountability are placed and how directing high stakes to one group relative to another can lead to different outcomes. We provide an important contribution to by demonstrating that where you place the stakes matters. We identify the type of test-based accountability in 45 countries or areas, then, using multi-level modeling examine the relationship between type of test-based accountability and shadow education participation. Our findings suggest participation in shadow education is higher in systems where high stakes are placed on students solely, or with educators, compared to when stakes are placed on educators alone. Results have implications for designing accountability policy and suggest that to reduce the prevalence of shadow education in a country, you need to consider where you place the stakes on the national test.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Education
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2025.2457787
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Where you place the stakes matter: examining the relationship between test-based accountability and shadow education

Xiao Dong Xu, William C. Smith, Huan Jiang
1 citations
Comparative Education
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
5.59
article

Where you place the stakes matter: examining the relationship between test-based accountability and shadow education

Xiao Dong Xu, William C. Smith, Huan Jiang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Accountability is a nearly ubiquitous part of education systems around the world. However, often missing is an explicit discussion on who the stakes of accountability are placed and how directing high stakes to one group relative to another can lead to different outcomes. We provide an important contribution to by demonstrating that where you place the stakes matters. We identify the type of test-based accountability in 45 countries or areas, then, using multi-level modeling examine the relationship between type of test-based accountability and shadow education participation. Our findings suggest participation in shadow education is higher in systems where high stakes are placed on students solely, or with educators, compared to when stakes are placed on educators alone. Results have implications for designing accountability policy and suggest that to reduce the prevalence of shadow education in a country, you need to consider where you place the stakes on the national test.

Comparative EducationVol. 61(4)
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
5.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.