The second financial services revolution? The quiet politics of open banking reform in the UK

Open banking was heralded as the key to promoting competition in UK retail banking markets. After a slow start the post-pandemic uptake of open banking tools suggested that a second financial services revolution was indeed underway. Yet by 2024 there were also clear signs that the so-called silent revolution had failed. The aim of this paper is to explain why. Using Culpepper’s (2010) concept of ‘noisy politics’ we argue that against the background of disillusionment with incumbent banks a more incisive, pro-reform statecraft emerged during the design of open banking (2015-18); under these conditions incumbent bank power waned. However, the return to ‘quiet politics’ – compounded by the political uncertainty surrounding Brexit and the delegation of authority to technocratic institutions – allowed incumbent banks to slow the implementation process (2018-23) and reorient their strategy towards acquisitions and partnerships with technologically agile fintech firms. In so doing bank power reasserted itself, stymieing the progress of open banking reform.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Competition & Change
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294251320569
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The second financial services revolution? The quiet politics of open banking reform in the UK

Huw Macartney, Chris Clarke
3 citations
Competition & Change
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
6.62
article

The second financial services revolution? The quiet politics of open banking reform in the UK

Huw Macartney, Chris Clarke
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Open banking was heralded as the key to promoting competition in UK retail banking markets. After a slow start the post-pandemic uptake of open banking tools suggested that a second financial services revolution was indeed underway. Yet by 2024 there were also clear signs that the so-called silent revolution had failed. The aim of this paper is to explain why. Using Culpepper’s (2010) concept of ‘noisy politics’ we argue that against the background of disillusionment with incumbent banks a more incisive, pro-reform statecraft emerged during the design of open banking (2015-18); under these conditions incumbent bank power waned. However, the return to ‘quiet politics’ – compounded by the political uncertainty surrounding Brexit and the delegation of authority to technocratic institutions – allowed incumbent banks to slow the implementation process (2018-23) and reorient their strategy towards acquisitions and partnerships with technologically agile fintech firms. In so doing bank power reasserted itself, stymieing the progress of open banking reform.

Competition & Change
University of Warwick (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
British Academy
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
6.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.