Assessing ecosystem services in protected areas: trade-offs and hotspots in Friuli Venezia Giulia region (northeastern Italy)

Protected areas (PAs) are expected to provide multiple ecosystem services (ESs), but quantitative assessments on their effectiveness in maintaining ESs are often lacking. This work aims to assess the effectiveness of PAs in delivering multiple ESs compared to unprotected areas (NPAs), while exploring trade-offs and synergies between ESs and their hotspots. To this end we quantified, mapped and analysed four forest-related ESs in mountainous region of North-eastern Italy, which includes several PAs of Natura 2000 network. We found higher values of habitat provision and recreation supply ESs in PAs rather than in NPAs, but lower C storage and erosion control ES. No extreme trade-offs between ESs were observed, and hotspots were identified both inside and outside PAs. Our results suggested that landscapes composition in land use and cover as well as their geo-climatic characteristics mostly influenced PAs and NPAs’ ability to provide ESs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biodiversity
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2025.2460759
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing ecosystem services in protected areas: trade-offs and hotspots in Friuli Venezia Giulia region (northeastern Italy)

Valentina Olmo, Stefano Balbi, Francesco Petruzzellis, Giovanni Bacaro et al.
4 citations
Biodiversity
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
4.42
article

Assessing ecosystem services in protected areas: trade-offs and hotspots in Friuli Venezia Giulia region (northeastern Italy)

Valentina Olmo, Stefano Balbi, Francesco Petruzzellis, Giovanni Bacaro, Maurizia Sigura, Giorgio Alberti
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Protected areas (PAs) are expected to provide multiple ecosystem services (ESs), but quantitative assessments on their effectiveness in maintaining ESs are often lacking. This work aims to assess the effectiveness of PAs in delivering multiple ESs compared to unprotected areas (NPAs), while exploring trade-offs and synergies between ESs and their hotspots. To this end we quantified, mapped and analysed four forest-related ESs in mountainous region of North-eastern Italy, which includes several PAs of Natura 2000 network. We found higher values of habitat provision and recreation supply ESs in PAs rather than in NPAs, but lower C storage and erosion control ES. No extreme trade-offs between ESs were observed, and hotspots were identified both inside and outside PAs. Our results suggested that landscapes composition in land use and cover as well as their geo-climatic characteristics mostly influenced PAs and NPAs’ ability to provide ESs.

BiodiversityVol. 26(2)
Ikerbasque (ES), University of Udine (IT), University of Padua (IT), University of Trieste (IT), University of the Basque Country (ES), Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT)
Eusko Jaurlaritza, Regione Autonoma Friuli Venezia Giulia
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.