Testing Very Preterm Black Children to Examine Potential Assessment Bias in Two Language Tests

The comparison of scores on the CSBS and the CDI: WG showed no significant difference between the Black and White children, indicating that there may not be evidence to support bias for the premature children in this study. The correlation between the gestural subtest of the CSBS and the CDI: WG showed that direct observation by clinicians was similar to the observations of the parents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_persp-24-00134
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing Very Preterm Black Children to Examine Potential Assessment Bias in Two Language Tests

Mekibib Altaye, Lisa L. Hunter, Tamika Odum, Jennifer Vannest et al.
1 citations
Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Language Development and Disorders
3.44
article

Testing Very Preterm Black Children to Examine Potential Assessment Bias in Two Language Tests

Mekibib Altaye, Lisa L. Hunter, Tamika Odum, Jennifer Vannest, Nancy A. Creaghead, Amy Hobek, Lauren Prather, Juanita Lackey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The comparison of scores on the CSBS and the CDI: WG showed no significant difference between the Black and White children, indicating that there may not be evidence to support bias for the premature children in this study. The correlation between the gestural subtest of the CSBS and the CDI: WG showed that direct observation by clinicians was similar to the observations of the parents.

Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest GroupsVol. 10(2)
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), University of Cincinnati (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Language Development and Disorders
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.