Exploring Medical Gaslighting: Efforts to Enhance Communication and Trust in Healthcare

Medical gaslighting, a phenomenon whereby healthcare providers may unintentionally dismiss or minimize patients’ concerns, is an emerging issue that poses a significant risk to patient safety. It can contribute to delayed diagnoses, mismanagement of care, and the exacerbation of health disparities, particularly among marginalized populations. Physician leaders, who play a key role in shaping institutional culture and advancing quality care, must recognize the impact of medical gaslighting and actively work toward solutions that balance the responsibilities of both physicians and patients. This article explores the connection between medical gaslighting, priming, and patient safety, focusing on unconscious biases, diagnostic errors, and communication barriers in clinical decision-making. The authors examine how priming — when prior experiences shape perceptions and decisions — can inadvertently exacerbate medical gaslighting. Addressing medical gaslighting requires systematic interventions, including educating about implicit bias, promoting patient advocacy, implementing evidence-based diagnostic protocols, and potential applications for artificial intelligence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Physician leadership journal
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55834/plj.1846937739
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Medical Gaslighting: Efforts to Enhance Communication and Trust in Healthcare

Anthony D. Slonim, Nikhil Sood, Kryss Shane
1 citations
Physician leadership journal
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
4.20
article

Exploring Medical Gaslighting: Efforts to Enhance Communication and Trust in Healthcare

Anthony D. Slonim, Nikhil Sood, Kryss Shane
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Medical gaslighting, a phenomenon whereby healthcare providers may unintentionally dismiss or minimize patients’ concerns, is an emerging issue that poses a significant risk to patient safety. It can contribute to delayed diagnoses, mismanagement of care, and the exacerbation of health disparities, particularly among marginalized populations. Physician leaders, who play a key role in shaping institutional culture and advancing quality care, must recognize the impact of medical gaslighting and actively work toward solutions that balance the responsibilities of both physicians and patients. This article explores the connection between medical gaslighting, priming, and patient safety, focusing on unconscious biases, diagnostic errors, and communication barriers in clinical decision-making. The authors examine how priming — when prior experiences shape perceptions and decisions — can inadvertently exacerbate medical gaslighting. Addressing medical gaslighting requires systematic interventions, including educating about implicit bias, promoting patient advocacy, implementing evidence-based diagnostic protocols, and potential applications for artificial intelligence.

Physician leadership journalVol. 12(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.