Diagnostic Performance of a Type III Portable Monitoring Device for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pregnant Women: A Prospective Validation Study

<b><i>Rationale:</i></b> Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) during pregnancy is linked to negative maternal and neonatal outcomes. Diagnosing OSA in this population is particularly challenging. Portable monitoring devices (PMD) present a potential alternative to polysomnography (PSG), but their effectiveness in pregnant women is uncertain. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of a PMD to detect OSA in pregnant women. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A prospective study of 136 middle-aged pregnant women (34 ± 4 years) in their third trimester of pregnancy (34 ± 3 weeks) who underwent laboratory type III PMD and PSG simultaneously. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Using an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥5 event/h by PSG, OSA was diagnosed in 10.3% of women (mild OSA: 86%; moderate OSA: 14%). An acceptable positive correlation was found between both tests in the AHI (<i>r</i> = 0.787; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI) (<i>r</i> = 0.806; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The agreement limits between PSG and type III PMD were -4.1 to 5.4 for AHI and -6.0 to 4.5 for ODI. The sensitivity and specificity of type III PMD for an AHI ≥5 events/h were 57.1% and 99.2%, respectively, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 88.9% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.3%. On a receiver operating characteristic curve, the best cutoff point of AHI by type III PMD to identify OSA according to PSG criteria was 2.25 events/h. The sensibility and specificity for this point were 85.7% and 88.5%, respectively, with a PPV of 46.2% and NPV of 98.2%. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> A type III PMD with an AHI cutoff of 5 events/h could be a good alternative for OSA diagnosis in pregnant women. Additionally, an AHI ≥2.25 event/h demonstrates good diagnostic performance, but its low positive predictive value suggests that it is more appropriate as a screening tool. Further studies are needed to validate this sleep study tool in pregnant women, particularly in home settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Women s Health
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.1033
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Performance of a Type III Portable Monitoring Device for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pregnant Women: A Prospective Validation Study

Paloma Giménez, Olga Mediano, Ainhoa Álvarez Ruiz De Larrínaga, Mónica de la Peña et al.
1 citations
Journal of Women s Health
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
1.16
article

Diagnostic Performance of a Type III Portable Monitoring Device for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pregnant Women: A Prospective Validation Study

Paloma Giménez, Olga Mediano, Ainhoa Álvarez Ruiz De Larrínaga, Mónica de la Peña, Sofía Romero-Peralta, Francisco García‐Río, José Antonio Peña‐Zarza, María Cerdà Moncadas, Mercedes Codina Marcet, Alberto Alonso‐Fernández, Miguel Alonso
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Rationale:</i></b> Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) during pregnancy is linked to negative maternal and neonatal outcomes. Diagnosing OSA in this population is particularly challenging. Portable monitoring devices (PMD) present a potential alternative to polysomnography (PSG), but their effectiveness in pregnant women is uncertain. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of a PMD to detect OSA in pregnant women. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A prospective study of 136 middle-aged pregnant women (34 ± 4 years) in their third trimester of pregnancy (34 ± 3 weeks) who underwent laboratory type III PMD and PSG simultaneously. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Using an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥5 event/h by PSG, OSA was diagnosed in 10.3% of women (mild OSA: 86%; moderate OSA: 14%). An acceptable positive correlation was found between both tests in the AHI (<i>r</i> = 0.787; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI) (<i>r</i> = 0.806; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The agreement limits between PSG and type III PMD were -4.1 to 5.4 for AHI and -6.0 to 4.5 for ODI. The sensitivity and specificity of type III PMD for an AHI ≥5 events/h were 57.1% and 99.2%, respectively, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 88.9% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.3%. On a receiver operating characteristic curve, the best cutoff point of AHI by type III PMD to identify OSA according to PSG criteria was 2.25 events/h. The sensibility and specificity for this point were 85.7% and 88.5%, respectively, with a PPV of 46.2% and NPV of 98.2%. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> A type III PMD with an AHI cutoff of 5 events/h could be a good alternative for OSA diagnosis in pregnant women. Additionally, an AHI ≥2.25 event/h demonstrates good diagnostic performance, but its low positive predictive value suggests that it is more appropriate as a screening tool. Further studies are needed to validate this sleep study tool in pregnant women, particularly in home settings.

Journal of Women s HealthVol. 34(5)
Universidad de Alcalá (ES), Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES), Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (ES), Fundación Hospital Manacor (ES), Hospital Universitario Araba (ES), Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (ES), Servicio de Salud de Castilla La Mancha (ES), Hospital Universitario Son Espases (ES)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.