P300 to Low and High Frequency Stimuli Are Not Influenced by Intensity in Adults with Normal Hearing

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Since high frequencies are susceptible to disruption in various types of hearing loss, a symptom which is common in people with tinnitus, the aim of the study was to investigate EEG cortical auditory evoked and P300 responses to both a high- and low frequency-centered oddball paradigm to begin to establish the most suitable cognitive physiologic testing conditions for those with both unimpaired hearing and those with hearing impairments. <b>Methods</b>: Cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) P1, N1, P2 and P300 (subtraction wave) peaks were identified in response to high- (standard: 6000 Hz, deviant: 8000 Hz) and low frequency (Standard: 375 Hz, Deviant: 500 Hz) oddball paradigms. Each paradigm was presented at various intensity levels. Latencies and amplitudes were then computed for each condition to assess the effects of frequency and intensity. <b>Results</b>: Stimulus intensity had no effect on either the high- or low frequency paradigms of P300 characteristics. In contrast, for the low frequency paradigm, intensity influenced the N1 latency and P2 amplitude, while for the high frequency paradigm intensity influenced P1 and P2 latency and P2 amplitude. <b>Conclusions</b>: Obligatory CAEP components responded more readily to stimulus frequency and intensity changes, and one possible consideration is that higher frequencies could play a role in the response characteristics exhibited by N1 (except for N1 amplitude) and P2, given their involvement in attentional processes linked to the detection of warning cues. P300 latency and amplitude were not influenced by such factors. These findings support the hypothesis that disentangling the cognitive from the more sensory-based response is possible, even in those with hearing loss, provided that the patient's hearing loss is considered when determining the presentation level. While the present study was performed in participants with unimpaired hearing, these data set up future studies investigating the effectiveness of using similar methods in hearing-impaired persons.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Sciences
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15020209
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P300 to Low and High Frequency Stimuli Are Not Influenced by Intensity in Adults with Normal Hearing

Fabio Babiloni, Giulia Cartocci, Bianca Maria Serena Inguscio, Garrett Cardon et al.
Brain Sciences
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

P300 to Low and High Frequency Stimuli Are Not Influenced by Intensity in Adults with Normal Hearing

Fabio Babiloni, Giulia Cartocci, Bianca Maria Serena Inguscio, Garrett Cardon, D. Rossi, Julia Campbell, Anu Sharma
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Since high frequencies are susceptible to disruption in various types of hearing loss, a symptom which is common in people with tinnitus, the aim of the study was to investigate EEG cortical auditory evoked and P300 responses to both a high- and low frequency-centered oddball paradigm to begin to establish the most suitable cognitive physiologic testing conditions for those with both unimpaired hearing and those with hearing impairments. <b>Methods</b>: Cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) P1, N1, P2 and P300 (subtraction wave) peaks were identified in response to high- (standard: 6000 Hz, deviant: 8000 Hz) and low frequency (Standard: 375 Hz, Deviant: 500 Hz) oddball paradigms. Each paradigm was presented at various intensity levels. Latencies and amplitudes were then computed for each condition to assess the effects of frequency and intensity. <b>Results</b>: Stimulus intensity had no effect on either the high- or low frequency paradigms of P300 characteristics. In contrast, for the low frequency paradigm, intensity influenced the N1 latency and P2 amplitude, while for the high frequency paradigm intensity influenced P1 and P2 latency and P2 amplitude. <b>Conclusions</b>: Obligatory CAEP components responded more readily to stimulus frequency and intensity changes, and one possible consideration is that higher frequencies could play a role in the response characteristics exhibited by N1 (except for N1 amplitude) and P2, given their involvement in attentional processes linked to the detection of warning cues. P300 latency and amplitude were not influenced by such factors. These findings support the hypothesis that disentangling the cognitive from the more sensory-based response is possible, even in those with hearing loss, provided that the patient's hearing loss is considered when determining the presentation level. While the present study was performed in participants with unimpaired hearing, these data set up future studies investigating the effectiveness of using similar methods in hearing-impaired persons.

Brain SciencesVol. 15(2)
Brigham Young University (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Sapienza Università di Roma
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.