How are green spaces associated with chronic disease incidence in Australia? Direct health benefits and interactive effects with socioeconomic status based on multiple green space indicators

• Green spaces directly benefit certain diseases such as dementia and diabetes. • Street-level greenness provides the most prevalent direct health benefits. • Parks offer notable health benefits when interacting with socioeconomic status. • Green spaces benefit socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, especially aging areas. • Neighborhood green spaces show more health benefits than suburb-level green spaces. The health benefits of urban greenery are well-documented, yet findings vary depending on the green space indicators used. Given the limited Australia-based research incorporating both traditional and emerging indicators, this study employs the proportion of parkland, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and Google Street View Greenness (SVG), to explore how green spaces and their interactions with socioeconomic status relate to chronic disease incidence rates in Sydney at Statistical Area Levels 1 and 2 (SA1 and SA2). The findings indicate that: (1) While green spaces are not significantly related to overall chronic diseases, they show strong associations with specific diseases, particularly dementia (SA1: Park: coef. = -0.004, p < 0.001; NDVI: coef. = -0.008, p < 0.001; SVG: coef. = -0.009, p < 0.001; SA2: SVG: coef. = -0.005, p < 0.05) and diabetes (SA1: SVG: coef. = -0.013, p < 0.001; SA2: Park: coef. = -0.009, p < 0.05; NDVI: coef. = -0.016, p < 0.01; SVG: coef. = -0.033, p < 0.001), with SVG being the most prevalent predictor. (2) Green spaces, particularly parkland, may mitigate chronic disease risks in lower socioeconomic regions, especially in aging areas (SA1: age#Park: coef. = -0.125, p < 0.001; age#NDVI: coef. = -0.081, p < 0.01; age#SVG: coef. = -0.078, p < 0.01). Additionally, these associations are more pronounced at the neighborhood scale than at the suburb scale. This study examines multiple green space indicators from an Australian perspective, offering insights for international comparisons and public health improvements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Cities and Society
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.106229
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How are green spaces associated with chronic disease incidence in Australia? Direct health benefits and interactive effects with socioeconomic status based on multiple green space indicators

Fubin Luo, Yunzheng Zhang
6 citations
Sustainable Cities and Society
Urban Green Space and Health
7.20
article

How are green spaces associated with chronic disease incidence in Australia? Direct health benefits and interactive effects with socioeconomic status based on multiple green space indicators

Fubin Luo, Yunzheng Zhang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

• Green spaces directly benefit certain diseases such as dementia and diabetes. • Street-level greenness provides the most prevalent direct health benefits. • Parks offer notable health benefits when interacting with socioeconomic status. • Green spaces benefit socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, especially aging areas. • Neighborhood green spaces show more health benefits than suburb-level green spaces. The health benefits of urban greenery are well-documented, yet findings vary depending on the green space indicators used. Given the limited Australia-based research incorporating both traditional and emerging indicators, this study employs the proportion of parkland, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and Google Street View Greenness (SVG), to explore how green spaces and their interactions with socioeconomic status relate to chronic disease incidence rates in Sydney at Statistical Area Levels 1 and 2 (SA1 and SA2). The findings indicate that: (1) While green spaces are not significantly related to overall chronic diseases, they show strong associations with specific diseases, particularly dementia (SA1: Park: coef. = -0.004, p < 0.001; NDVI: coef. = -0.008, p < 0.001; SVG: coef. = -0.009, p < 0.001; SA2: SVG: coef. = -0.005, p < 0.05) and diabetes (SA1: SVG: coef. = -0.013, p < 0.001; SA2: Park: coef. = -0.009, p < 0.05; NDVI: coef. = -0.016, p < 0.01; SVG: coef. = -0.033, p < 0.001), with SVG being the most prevalent predictor. (2) Green spaces, particularly parkland, may mitigate chronic disease risks in lower socioeconomic regions, especially in aging areas (SA1: age#Park: coef. = -0.125, p < 0.001; age#NDVI: coef. = -0.081, p < 0.01; age#SVG: coef. = -0.078, p < 0.01). Additionally, these associations are more pronounced at the neighborhood scale than at the suburb scale. This study examines multiple green space indicators from an Australian perspective, offering insights for international comparisons and public health improvements.

Sustainable Cities and SocietyVol. 121
City University of Hong Kong (HK), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Urban Green Space and Health
7.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.