Distinguishing Abstracts of Human-Written and ChatGPT-Generated Papers in the Field of Computer Science

In the era of artificial intelligence, advanced technologies such as text deep fakes have emerged, utilizing AI and deep learning algorithms to generate text contents that convincingly mimic reality. Text-based deep fakes, commonly found in emails, articles, news, and social media posts, pose a significant threat to public trust. Our research proposes a method to distinguish between fake and genuine scientific abstracts in the field of computer science using a specialized dataset and deep learning models. The proposed detection model can differentiate between real and fake abstracts with 97.5% accuracy. Additionally, we employed metrics such as precision, recall, accuracy, and F1 score to measure the performance of our system in detail.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccke65377.2024.10874567
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinguishing Abstracts of Human-Written and ChatGPT-Generated Papers in the Field of Computer Science

Hamed Vahdat‐Nejad, Matin Hossein-Pour, Mohsen Arzani
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Distinguishing Abstracts of Human-Written and ChatGPT-Generated Papers in the Field of Computer Science

Hamed Vahdat‐Nejad, Matin Hossein-Pour, Mohsen Arzani
article en

Abstract

In the era of artificial intelligence, advanced technologies such as text deep fakes have emerged, utilizing AI and deep learning algorithms to generate text contents that convincingly mimic reality. Text-based deep fakes, commonly found in emails, articles, news, and social media posts, pose a significant threat to public trust. Our research proposes a method to distinguish between fake and genuine scientific abstracts in the field of computer science using a specialized dataset and deep learning models. The proposed detection model can differentiate between real and fake abstracts with 97.5% accuracy. Additionally, we employed metrics such as precision, recall, accuracy, and F1 score to measure the performance of our system in detail.

University of Birjand (IR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.