Predicting Treatment Response of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Major Depressive Disorder Using an Explainable Machine Learning Model Based on Electroencephalography and Clinical Features

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is highly heterogeneous in response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and identifying predictive biomarkers is essential for personalized treatment. However, most prior research studies have used either electroencephalography (EEG) or clinical features, lack interpretability, or have small sample sizes. This study included 74 patients with MDD who responded (responders) and 43 patients with MDD who did not respond (nonresponders) to rTMS. Eight baseline EEG metrics and clinical features were sent to 7 machine learning models to classify responders and nonresponders. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) was used to interpret feature contributions. Combining phase locking value and clinical features with support vector machine achieved optimal classification performance (accuracy = 97.33%). SHAP revealed that delta and beta band functional connectivity (F3-P7, F3-P4, P3-P8, T7-Cz) significantly influenced predictions and differed between groups. This study developed an explainable predictive framework to predict rTMS response in MDD, enhancing the accuracy of rTMS response prediction and supporting personalized treatment in MDD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.02.002
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Treatment Response of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Major Depressive Disorder Using an Explainable Machine Learning Model Based on Electroencephalography and Clinical Features

Meng Qi, Yanxiang Niu, Jinggui Song, Xiangying Ran et al.
5 citations
Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
7.16
article

Predicting Treatment Response of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Major Depressive Disorder Using an Explainable Machine Learning Model Based on Electroencephalography and Clinical Features

Meng Qi, Yanxiang Niu, Jinggui Song, Xiangying Ran, Zhixian Gao, Shiyang Lv, Xiaofeng Fan, Mingjie Zhu, Mingcai Li, Zongya Zhao, Yi Yu, Yongtao Xu, Junming Wang, Chang Wang, Wu Ren, Xuezhi Zhou, Mengyue Qiu
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is highly heterogeneous in response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and identifying predictive biomarkers is essential for personalized treatment. However, most prior research studies have used either electroencephalography (EEG) or clinical features, lack interpretability, or have small sample sizes. This study included 74 patients with MDD who responded (responders) and 43 patients with MDD who did not respond (nonresponders) to rTMS. Eight baseline EEG metrics and clinical features were sent to 7 machine learning models to classify responders and nonresponders. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) was used to interpret feature contributions. Combining phase locking value and clinical features with support vector machine achieved optimal classification performance (accuracy = 97.33%). SHAP revealed that delta and beta band functional connectivity (F3-P7, F3-P4, P3-P8, T7-Cz) significantly influenced predictions and differed between groups. This study developed an explainable predictive framework to predict rTMS response in MDD, enhancing the accuracy of rTMS response prediction and supporting personalized treatment in MDD.

Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and NeuroimagingVol. 10(6)
Tianjin University (CN), Henan University of Technology (CN), Neurological Surgery (US), Henan Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
7.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.