Numerical Simulation Noise and Its Significant Impact on the Dielectrophoretic Motion of Particles Near the Electrode Edges

Dielectrophoresis (DEP) has been extensively researched over the years for filtration, separation, detection, and collection of micro/nano/bioparticles. Numerical models have historically been employed to predict particle trajectories in three-dimensional (3D) DEP systems, but a common issue arises due to inherent noise near the edges of electrodes due to electric potential discontinuity, specifically when calculating electric field and gradient of electric field-squared, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∇</mml:mo> <mml:mo>|</mml:mo> <mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:msup><mml:mo>|</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$\nabla |E{|^2}$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> . This noise can be reduced to a certain extent with a finer mesh density but results near the electrode edge still have significant error. Realizing the importance of particle-electrode edge interactions prevalent in positive DEP systems, analytical solutions given by Sun et al. was incorporated to demonstrate an improved 3D model of interdigitated electrodes. The results of electric field and gradient of electric field-squared of the numerical model and the improved analytical 3D model were compared, within a simulation space of 50 µm height, 10 µm width, and 50 µm length with interdigitated electrodes of the same width and gap of 10 µm. The DEP particle trajectory error due to the noise was quantified for different particle sizes at various heights above the electrode edge. For example, at 5 V<sub>rms</sub>, a trapped 500 nm particles exhibited a velocity error of 10<sup>4</sup> µm/s (it should have been zero).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electrophoresis
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.8115
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical Simulation Noise and Its Significant Impact on the Dielectrophoretic Motion of Particles Near the Electrode Edges

Stuart J. Williams, Aaditya Venkatesha Babu Bangaru
3 citations
Electrophoresis
Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
2.02
article

Numerical Simulation Noise and Its Significant Impact on the Dielectrophoretic Motion of Particles Near the Electrode Edges

Stuart J. Williams, Aaditya Venkatesha Babu Bangaru
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Dielectrophoresis (DEP) has been extensively researched over the years for filtration, separation, detection, and collection of micro/nano/bioparticles. Numerical models have historically been employed to predict particle trajectories in three-dimensional (3D) DEP systems, but a common issue arises due to inherent noise near the edges of electrodes due to electric potential discontinuity, specifically when calculating electric field and gradient of electric field-squared, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∇</mml:mo> <mml:mo>|</mml:mo> <mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:msup><mml:mo>|</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$\nabla |E{|^2}$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> . This noise can be reduced to a certain extent with a finer mesh density but results near the electrode edge still have significant error. Realizing the importance of particle-electrode edge interactions prevalent in positive DEP systems, analytical solutions given by Sun et al. was incorporated to demonstrate an improved 3D model of interdigitated electrodes. The results of electric field and gradient of electric field-squared of the numerical model and the improved analytical 3D model were compared, within a simulation space of 50 µm height, 10 µm width, and 50 µm length with interdigitated electrodes of the same width and gap of 10 µm. The DEP particle trajectory error due to the noise was quantified for different particle sizes at various heights above the electrode edge. For example, at 5 V<sub>rms</sub>, a trapped 500 nm particles exhibited a velocity error of 10<sup>4</sup> µm/s (it should have been zero).

ElectrophoresisVol. 46(16)
University of Louisville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Numerical Simulation Noise and Its Significant Impact on the Dielectrophoretic Motion of Particles Near the Electrode Edges — Stuart J. Williams, Aaditya Venkatesha Babu Bangaru · Electrophoresis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS