Why Women Appear to Have Better Outcomes When Undergoing Screening for Lung Cancer

<b>Rationale:</b> Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of lung cancer (LC) screening (LCS) using computed tomography (CT) documented LC mortality reductions between 7.2% and 29.2%, compared with a chest radiograph (CXR). Women appear to have a greater reduction than men. <b>Objectives:</b> We sought to determine why women appear to have better outcomes from LCS compared with men. <b>Methods:</b> We used a secondary analysis of the National Lung Screening Trial, an RCT comparing CXR with CT among screen-eligible individuals ages 55-74 years. Descriptive statistics and a competing risk proportional hazards model that included an interaction between sex and screening arm were used to examine differences in screening outcomes by sex. <b>Results:</b> Of 31,530 men and 21,922 women, 648 (2.1%) and 373 (1.7%) died of LC during the study, respectively. Overall mortality was higher in men: 2,771 (8.8%) versus 1,198 (5.5%). In an adjusted competing cause of death analysis, the LC mortality subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) favoring CT was significant in women (sHR = 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.6-0.9; <i>P</i> = 0.003) but not men (sHR = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.78-1.06; <i>P</i> = 0.24). The interaction between screening arm and sex was not significant (<i>P</i> = 0.1). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart disease, which are more prevalent in men, were independently associated with LC death. LC deaths were consistently greater in the CT arm (vs. the CXR arm), for preexisting COPD and diabetes mellitus in men, but not women. Of those with LC, women in the CT arm had 53.7% prevalence of adenocarcinoma (AD) histology, whereas women in the CXR arm and men in both arms had approximately 36-41% AD prevalence. However, there was no overall difference between sexes in the screening difference for AD lethality. <b>Conclusion:</b> Women in the National Lung Screening Trial had a greater reduction in LC mortality that, although not statistically significant, could be the result of more prevalent comorbid disease in men, which contributed to greater all-cause and LC mortality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1513/annalsats.202408-863oc
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Women Appear to Have Better Outcomes When Undergoing Screening for Lung Cancer

Hormuzd A. Katki, Robert P. Young, Gerard A. Silvestri, Rebecca Landy et al.
4 citations
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
4.18
article

Why Women Appear to Have Better Outcomes When Undergoing Screening for Lung Cancer

Hormuzd A. Katki, Robert P. Young, Gerard A. Silvestri, Rebecca Landy, Ralph Ward, R.J. Scott
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Rationale:</b> Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of lung cancer (LC) screening (LCS) using computed tomography (CT) documented LC mortality reductions between 7.2% and 29.2%, compared with a chest radiograph (CXR). Women appear to have a greater reduction than men. <b>Objectives:</b> We sought to determine why women appear to have better outcomes from LCS compared with men. <b>Methods:</b> We used a secondary analysis of the National Lung Screening Trial, an RCT comparing CXR with CT among screen-eligible individuals ages 55-74 years. Descriptive statistics and a competing risk proportional hazards model that included an interaction between sex and screening arm were used to examine differences in screening outcomes by sex. <b>Results:</b> Of 31,530 men and 21,922 women, 648 (2.1%) and 373 (1.7%) died of LC during the study, respectively. Overall mortality was higher in men: 2,771 (8.8%) versus 1,198 (5.5%). In an adjusted competing cause of death analysis, the LC mortality subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) favoring CT was significant in women (sHR = 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.6-0.9; <i>P</i> = 0.003) but not men (sHR = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.78-1.06; <i>P</i> = 0.24). The interaction between screening arm and sex was not significant (<i>P</i> = 0.1). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart disease, which are more prevalent in men, were independently associated with LC death. LC deaths were consistently greater in the CT arm (vs. the CXR arm), for preexisting COPD and diabetes mellitus in men, but not women. Of those with LC, women in the CT arm had 53.7% prevalence of adenocarcinoma (AD) histology, whereas women in the CXR arm and men in both arms had approximately 36-41% AD prevalence. However, there was no overall difference between sexes in the screening difference for AD lethality. <b>Conclusion:</b> Women in the National Lung Screening Trial had a greater reduction in LC mortality that, although not statistically significant, could be the result of more prevalent comorbid disease in men, which contributed to greater all-cause and LC mortality.

Annals of the American Thoracic SocietyVol. 22(6)
Medical University of South Carolina (US), University of Auckland (NZ), National Cancer Institute (US), Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
4.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.