Introduction

Stefanie Gänger traces the global rise of thermometry and its numerical thresholds during the late nineteenth century, and the new understanding of fever as internal temperature above 37°C. The article reassembles how a fever was diagnosed prior to the mid-1800s, when it was not reducible to heat, let alone an exactly quantifiable temperature, and recapitulates the invention of thermometry in the city hospitals of mid-nineteenth-century Leipzig and Berlin. It endeavors to explain why these numerical standards could become self-evident facts in many societies around the world over the 1870s and 1880s, from Japan to Peru. It holds that the authority of “38°C” was not simply owing to the unsettling success of quantification, standardization, and “trust in numbers”12 in medicine, but also to the social organization of the medical profession, the period’s imperial order, and gendered epistemic hierarchies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Isis
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/733986
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human Rights and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Introduction

Andrea Bréard
1 citations
Isis
Human Rights and Development
4.20
article

Introduction

Andrea Bréard
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Stefanie Gänger traces the global rise of thermometry and its numerical thresholds during the late nineteenth century, and the new understanding of fever as internal temperature above 37°C. The article reassembles how a fever was diagnosed prior to the mid-1800s, when it was not reducible to heat, let alone an exactly quantifiable temperature, and recapitulates the invention of thermometry in the city hospitals of mid-nineteenth-century Leipzig and Berlin. It endeavors to explain why these numerical standards could become self-evident facts in many societies around the world over the 1870s and 1880s, from Japan to Peru. It holds that the authority of “38°C” was not simply owing to the unsettling success of quantification, standardization, and “trust in numbers”12 in medicine, but also to the social organization of the medical profession, the period’s imperial order, and gendered epistemic hierarchies.

IsisVol. 116(1)
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Human Rights and Development
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.