Innovative Approaches to CS Education Research that Enable All Students' Success

What does it mean to conduct computer science education research in a manner that ensures that the evidence produced is high quality and benefits a wide variety of students? One can pour over various guides from institutions like What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) and the American Psychology Association (APA). However, what many standards fail to include is a holistic perspective of conducting education research, including guidelines for ensuring that the aggregated data presented represents the student population that the research will ultimately serve. In this panel, we tackle both and explore approaches that have been used in other education research fields as well as those appropriate to CS education research that can be leveraged to ensure that all students' needs, experiences, cultures, identities, and voices are captured and presented in our research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3641555.3704716
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovative Approaches to CS Education Research that Enable All Students' Success

Joseph Carroll-Miranda, Joshua Childs, Stefanie L. Marshall, Tamara Pearson et al.
Teaching and Learning Programming
article

Innovative Approaches to CS Education Research that Enable All Students' Success

Joseph Carroll-Miranda, Joshua Childs, Stefanie L. Marshall, Tamara Pearson, Monica M. McGill
article en

Abstract

What does it mean to conduct computer science education research in a manner that ensures that the evidence produced is high quality and benefits a wide variety of students? One can pour over various guides from institutions like What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) and the American Psychology Association (APA). However, what many standards fail to include is a holistic perspective of conducting education research, including guidelines for ensuring that the aggregated data presented represents the student population that the research will ultimately serve. In this panel, we tackle both and explore approaches that have been used in other education research fields as well as those appropriate to CS education research that can be leveraged to ensure that all students' needs, experiences, cultures, identities, and voices are captured and presented in our research.

Georgia Institute of Technology (US), University of Puerto Rico at Río Piedras (PR), Institute for Advancing Computing Education, The University of Texas at Austin (US), Michigan State University (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Teaching and Learning Programming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Innovative Approaches to CS Education Research that Enable All Students' Success — Joseph Carroll-Miranda, Joshua Childs, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS