Mechanism of zinc phosphate conversion coating formation on iron-based substrates

This study investigates the formation mechanism of zinc phosphate conversion coatings on pearlitic steel and ferritic iron with emphasis on the impact of microstructure and substrate corrosion. Deposition parameters, including pH (2 and 2.5) and temperature (50°C and 70°C), were explored. Open circuit potential (OCP) monitoring was used to identify different stages of coating formation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) showed that higher temperatures accelerated the growth of phosphate crystals, composed of hopeite (Zn 3 (PO 4 ) 2 ) and phosphophyllite (Zn 2 Fe(PO 4 ) 2 ) on both substrates. Deposition at pH 2.5 led to bulk-solution precipitation on substrates, while at pH 2, coatings were growing from the substrate surface. Electrochemical impedance (EIS) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) measurements revealed that iron corroded around 2.5 times slower than steel. As identified by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) in SEM, iron phosphate particles were formed on both substrates. These particles accumulated in higher amounts on steel, while iron exhibited minimal corrosion product accumulation. Different phosphating stages were then studied using SEM and time-of-flight – secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS). ToF-SIMS depth profiles highlighted a thicker iron phosphate layer on steel at early phosphating stages, compared to iron. Focused ion beam (FIB) cross-sections of fully phosphated steel showed a porous interlayer, mainly composed of iron-phosphate, at the coating/steel interface. Zinc phosphate crystals were nucleated on this porous layer or formed by near-surface solution precipitation. Iron substrates did not show this porous interlayer, and had lower phosphatability with only near-surface solution precipitation of zinc phosphate crystals. • Deposition at pH 2 and 70 °C resulted in efficient phosphate coating formation. • Pearlitic steel had high corrosion rate and rapid buildup of corrosion products. • A porous iron phosphate-based interlayer boosted coating formation on steel. • Phosphating steel included surface-grown and near-surface precipitated phosphates. • Slower phosphating on iron occurred with lower corrosion rate and no porous interface.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corrosion Science
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2025.112796
Citations
25
Primary Topic
Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanism of zinc phosphate conversion coating formation on iron-based substrates

Joakim Reuteler, Patrik Schmutz, Mohammad Alinezhadfar, Ueli Angst et al.
25 citations
Corrosion Science
Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
12.95
article

Mechanism of zinc phosphate conversion coating formation on iron-based substrates

Joakim Reuteler, Patrik Schmutz, Mohammad Alinezhadfar, Ueli Angst, Rowena Crockett, Fabio E. Furcas
article en
25 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the formation mechanism of zinc phosphate conversion coatings on pearlitic steel and ferritic iron with emphasis on the impact of microstructure and substrate corrosion. Deposition parameters, including pH (2 and 2.5) and temperature (50°C and 70°C), were explored. Open circuit potential (OCP) monitoring was used to identify different stages of coating formation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) showed that higher temperatures accelerated the growth of phosphate crystals, composed of hopeite (Zn 3 (PO 4 ) 2 ) and phosphophyllite (Zn 2 Fe(PO 4 ) 2 ) on both substrates. Deposition at pH 2.5 led to bulk-solution precipitation on substrates, while at pH 2, coatings were growing from the substrate surface. Electrochemical impedance (EIS) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) measurements revealed that iron corroded around 2.5 times slower than steel. As identified by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) in SEM, iron phosphate particles were formed on both substrates. These particles accumulated in higher amounts on steel, while iron exhibited minimal corrosion product accumulation. Different phosphating stages were then studied using SEM and time-of-flight – secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS). ToF-SIMS depth profiles highlighted a thicker iron phosphate layer on steel at early phosphating stages, compared to iron. Focused ion beam (FIB) cross-sections of fully phosphated steel showed a porous interlayer, mainly composed of iron-phosphate, at the coating/steel interface. Zinc phosphate crystals were nucleated on this porous layer or formed by near-surface solution precipitation. Iron substrates did not show this porous interlayer, and had lower phosphatability with only near-surface solution precipitation of zinc phosphate crystals. • Deposition at pH 2 and 70 °C resulted in efficient phosphate coating formation. • Pearlitic steel had high corrosion rate and rapid buildup of corrosion products. • A porous iron phosphate-based interlayer boosted coating formation on steel. • Phosphating steel included surface-grown and near-surface precipitated phosphates. • Slower phosphating on iron occurred with lower corrosion rate and no porous interface.

Corrosion ScienceVol. 248
ETH Zurich (CH), Institute for Biomedical Engineering (CH), Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
12.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.