Evaluating effects of data quality and variable weighting on habitat suitability modelling

Habitat modelling is important in the conservation and management of fishes and can be sensitive to data inputs and model configuration. Survey data used in Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) models may undergo changing sampling protocols over time, and these inconsistencies may impact results. Additionally, the various habitat variables included in HSI models are typically given equal weights, even though some variables may have greater influence over distribution than others. The Long River Survey, part of the Hudson River Biological Monitoring Program, in the Hudson River Estuary (HRE), has undergone considerable protocol changes, and was calibrated to address these issues in 2023. This survey and region are an excellent case study to compare two approaches in constructing HSI models: using calibrated versus uncalibrated abundance data and weighting all environmental variables equally or using a model-based weighting method. The results of this study suggest that using calibrated abundance data with unweighted habitat variables provide the most robust estimates for bay anchovy suitable spawning habitat in the HRE, which indicates that in cases when sampling has not been consistent over time, using calibrated abundance data in habitat suitability modelling may lead to improved models. Some model configurations were unable to identify a significant trend in suitable habitat over time and overestimated habitat quality illustrating the importance of carefully considering data inputs and model configuration when building habitat models to properly quantify suitable habitat and contribute to ecosystem-based fisheries management in the wake of climate change. • Habitat suitability model results are impacted by input data and model configuration. • Using calibrated abundance data can improve predictions of suitable habitat. • Weighting environmental variables can lead to biased results. • Careful consideration is needed when building habitat suitability index models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Informatics
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103086
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating effects of data quality and variable weighting on habitat suitability modelling

Robyn Linner, Stephanie Arsenault, YangQuan Chen
2 citations
Ecological Informatics
Species Distribution and Climate Change
3.68
article

Evaluating effects of data quality and variable weighting on habitat suitability modelling

Robyn Linner, Stephanie Arsenault, YangQuan Chen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Habitat modelling is important in the conservation and management of fishes and can be sensitive to data inputs and model configuration. Survey data used in Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) models may undergo changing sampling protocols over time, and these inconsistencies may impact results. Additionally, the various habitat variables included in HSI models are typically given equal weights, even though some variables may have greater influence over distribution than others. The Long River Survey, part of the Hudson River Biological Monitoring Program, in the Hudson River Estuary (HRE), has undergone considerable protocol changes, and was calibrated to address these issues in 2023. This survey and region are an excellent case study to compare two approaches in constructing HSI models: using calibrated versus uncalibrated abundance data and weighting all environmental variables equally or using a model-based weighting method. The results of this study suggest that using calibrated abundance data with unweighted habitat variables provide the most robust estimates for bay anchovy suitable spawning habitat in the HRE, which indicates that in cases when sampling has not been consistent over time, using calibrated abundance data in habitat suitability modelling may lead to improved models. Some model configurations were unable to identify a significant trend in suitable habitat over time and overestimated habitat quality illustrating the importance of carefully considering data inputs and model configuration when building habitat models to properly quantify suitable habitat and contribute to ecosystem-based fisheries management in the wake of climate change. • Habitat suitability model results are impacted by input data and model configuration. • Using calibrated abundance data can improve predictions of suitable habitat. • Weighting environmental variables can lead to biased results. • Careful consideration is needed when building habitat suitability index models.

Ecological InformaticsVol. 87
Maine Department of Marine Resources (US), Stony Brook University (US)
Hudson River Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
3.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.