Development of an Environmental Impact Methodology for Arctic Shipping: Exploring FMEA and STPA applications considering a Dynamic (varying) Baseline.

Arctic shipping poses environmental risks due to the region's fragile ecosystems and rapid climate changes. Effective risk assessment tools are needed to ensure sustainable expansion and to carry out environmental impact assessments. This paper explores applications of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Systems-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) coupled with the consequences of a “Dynamic baseline approach” for Arctic shipping environmental impact assessment. Shipping entails complex interactions between environmental, technical, human, and organizational factors. FMEA identifies failure modes and their effects through component-level analysis. STPA examines how unsafe control actions can emerge from interactions between system components. Combining these techniques with a dynamic (variable) baseline, accounting for inherent ongoing changing Arctic conditions, offers a robust methodology. A qualitative case study shows that prioritizing hazards by risk, yields highest concerns, as increased greenhouse gas emissions, black carbon deposition on ice and snow, and response delays to accidents represent some of the most important identified threats to the environment. The use of FMEA and STPA are complementary, and differences are highlighted. The methodology applied, should be representative for the qualitative risk analysis methodology, and while the findings are impacted by the perspectives of the authors, the process followed is intended to identify and rank risks in a consistent manner. Mitigations measures must be in place to target these issues. Constant monitoring of the changing ecological and socioeconomic Arctic baselines supports the responses. This methodology offers a starting point for systematically addressing environmental impact risks in the data-limited Arctic. Integrating failure modes and effect analysis, system theories and dynamic baselines, account for identification of the complex interactions, influencing environmental risks in this rapidly evolving region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Marine Structures
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36956/sms.v6i2.1110
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of an Environmental Impact Methodology for Arctic Shipping: Exploring FMEA and STPA applications considering a Dynamic (varying) Baseline.

Ove Tobias Gudmestad, Giacomo Stirpe
1 citations
Sustainable Marine Structures
Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
0.48
article

Development of an Environmental Impact Methodology for Arctic Shipping: Exploring FMEA and STPA applications considering a Dynamic (varying) Baseline.

Ove Tobias Gudmestad, Giacomo Stirpe
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Arctic shipping poses environmental risks due to the region's fragile ecosystems and rapid climate changes. Effective risk assessment tools are needed to ensure sustainable expansion and to carry out environmental impact assessments. This paper explores applications of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Systems-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) coupled with the consequences of a “Dynamic baseline approach” for Arctic shipping environmental impact assessment. Shipping entails complex interactions between environmental, technical, human, and organizational factors. FMEA identifies failure modes and their effects through component-level analysis. STPA examines how unsafe control actions can emerge from interactions between system components. Combining these techniques with a dynamic (variable) baseline, accounting for inherent ongoing changing Arctic conditions, offers a robust methodology. A qualitative case study shows that prioritizing hazards by risk, yields highest concerns, as increased greenhouse gas emissions, black carbon deposition on ice and snow, and response delays to accidents represent some of the most important identified threats to the environment. The use of FMEA and STPA are complementary, and differences are highlighted. The methodology applied, should be representative for the qualitative risk analysis methodology, and while the findings are impacted by the perspectives of the authors, the process followed is intended to identify and rank risks in a consistent manner. Mitigations measures must be in place to target these issues. Constant monitoring of the changing ecological and socioeconomic Arctic baselines supports the responses. This methodology offers a starting point for systematically addressing environmental impact risks in the data-limited Arctic. Integrating failure modes and effect analysis, system theories and dynamic baselines, account for identification of the complex interactions, influencing environmental risks in this rapidly evolving region.

Sustainable Marine Structures
University of Stavanger (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
0.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.