Broadening the Scope of Trust: How Different Radii of Trust Influence Political Conflict in China

This study examines the relationship between different radii of trust and political conflict in China. By analyzing the China Family Panel Studies survey (2012-2018) with lagged trust measures, we employ instrumental variable and causal mediation approaches to find that the effects of social trust on political conflict vary with the radius of trust, mediated by experiences of unfair political treatment. Individuals with high levels of specific and generalized trust were less likely to encounter unfair political treatment and therefore less likely to experience conflict with officials. In contrast, those with higher levels of trust in Americans were more likely to experience unfair political treatment, which increased their likelihood of political conflict. Our findings suggest that the conventional notions of the radius of trust need to be expanded to incorporate distinctions between trust in fellow nationals and trust in non-nationals. By examining how the scope of generalized trust can be broadened through an understanding of Chinese traditional culture, our study offers insights into how a radius-sensitive understanding of trust shapes political conflict propensity in China.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Asian Sociology
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21588/dns.2024.53.4.002
Primary Topic
Social Capital and Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Broadening the Scope of Trust: How Different Radii of Trust Influence Political Conflict in China

Sang-Myung Lee, In-Hyee Hwang
Journal of Asian Sociology
Social Capital and Networks
article

Broadening the Scope of Trust: How Different Radii of Trust Influence Political Conflict in China

Sang-Myung Lee, In-Hyee Hwang
article en

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between different radii of trust and political conflict in China. By analyzing the China Family Panel Studies survey (2012-2018) with lagged trust measures, we employ instrumental variable and causal mediation approaches to find that the effects of social trust on political conflict vary with the radius of trust, mediated by experiences of unfair political treatment. Individuals with high levels of specific and generalized trust were less likely to encounter unfair political treatment and therefore less likely to experience conflict with officials. In contrast, those with higher levels of trust in Americans were more likely to experience unfair political treatment, which increased their likelihood of political conflict. Our findings suggest that the conventional notions of the radius of trust need to be expanded to incorporate distinctions between trust in fellow nationals and trust in non-nationals. By examining how the scope of generalized trust can be broadened through an understanding of Chinese traditional culture, our study offers insights into how a radius-sensitive understanding of trust shapes political conflict propensity in China.

Journal of Asian SociologyVol. 53(4)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Social Capital and Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Broadening the Scope of Trust: How Different Radii of Trust Influence Political Conflict in China — Sang-Myung Lee, In-Hyee Hwang · Journal of Asian Sociology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS