ARBITRATION IN ROMANIA: LOOKING GOOD, HOPING FOR MORE

This paper provides a current overview of the arbitration legal framework in Romania, analysing the historic development of an arbitration friendly jurisdiction. The paper goes on to describe the implementation of the expected international arbitration pillars, and illustrate some novel and progressive legal provisions on arbitration relating, inter alia, to, applicable law, parallel proceedings and arbitrators’ liability. It provides a critical commentary on certain persistent ‘arbitration unfriendly’ terms in the Romanian national arbitration law and take on two very recent legislative developments involving investment arbitration and regulation of institutional arbitration. It also pinpoints the need for construction disputes to be settled by appropriate fora such as specialist construction courts or in arbitration, and the need for the current expert practice with respect to the evaluation of time extensions and additional payment (which are, at present, reflecting the common law approach) to be adapted to the civil liability principles enshrined in the Romanian Civil Code.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Strani pravni zivot
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56461/spz_24416kj
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ARBITRATION IN ROMANIA: LOOKING GOOD, HOPING FOR MORE

Cristina Alexe, Oana Șoimulescu
Strani pravni zivot
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

ARBITRATION IN ROMANIA: LOOKING GOOD, HOPING FOR MORE

Cristina Alexe, Oana Șoimulescu
article en

Abstract

This paper provides a current overview of the arbitration legal framework in Romania, analysing the historic development of an arbitration friendly jurisdiction. The paper goes on to describe the implementation of the expected international arbitration pillars, and illustrate some novel and progressive legal provisions on arbitration relating, inter alia, to, applicable law, parallel proceedings and arbitrators’ liability. It provides a critical commentary on certain persistent ‘arbitration unfriendly’ terms in the Romanian national arbitration law and take on two very recent legislative developments involving investment arbitration and regulation of institutional arbitration. It also pinpoints the need for construction disputes to be settled by appropriate fora such as specialist construction courts or in arbitration, and the need for the current expert practice with respect to the evaluation of time extensions and additional payment (which are, at present, reflecting the common law approach) to be adapted to the civil liability principles enshrined in the Romanian Civil Code.

Strani pravni zivotVol. 68(4)
Taoka Hospital (JP), Hexcel (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ARBITRATION IN ROMANIA: LOOKING GOOD, HOPING FOR MORE — Cristina Alexe, Oana Șoimulescu · Strani pravni zivot (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS