Auto-grading in Computing Education: Perceptions and Use

Auto-grading technologies have become increasingly prevalent in computing education, driven by the need to handle growing class sizes and provide timely and effective feedback. We conducted a survey of 44 computer science instructors at various institutions in order to gather instructor experience and use of auto-graders, the features instructors value most, and the challenges and limitations faced when using these tools. We specifically asked about factors such as grading strategies and policies, opinions on existing tools, and other automated grading methods they employ. Our results indicated that instructors prefer tools that offer significant customizability and integration capabilities, with functionality and program output-based grading as the most commonly used approaches. They emphasized the need for integrated auto-grading solutions that include robust core features and prioritize extensibility to better align with pedagogical goals and to support instructors in managing the increasing demands of computer science education. Based on these findings, we conclude that existing solutions should be improved to address instructor-reported preferences and diverse educational needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3641554.3701900
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Auto-grading in Computing Education: Perceptions and Use

Burju Ruth, John R. Hott
2 citations
Teaching and Learning Programming
3.39
article

Auto-grading in Computing Education: Perceptions and Use

Burju Ruth, John R. Hott
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Auto-grading technologies have become increasingly prevalent in computing education, driven by the need to handle growing class sizes and provide timely and effective feedback. We conducted a survey of 44 computer science instructors at various institutions in order to gather instructor experience and use of auto-graders, the features instructors value most, and the challenges and limitations faced when using these tools. We specifically asked about factors such as grading strategies and policies, opinions on existing tools, and other automated grading methods they employ. Our results indicated that instructors prefer tools that offer significant customizability and integration capabilities, with functionality and program output-based grading as the most commonly used approaches. They emphasized the need for integrated auto-grading solutions that include robust core features and prioritize extensibility to better align with pedagogical goals and to support instructors in managing the increasing demands of computer science education. Based on these findings, we conclude that existing solutions should be improved to address instructor-reported preferences and diverse educational needs.

University of Virginia (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Teaching and Learning Programming
3.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.