A Multi-Institutional Assessment of Oral Exams in Software Courses

Oral exams are an inviting alternative to traditional paper-and-pencil exams. However, they are largely under-utilized in computer science education. In this report, we describe our design for comprehensive final oral exams in five software engineering class sections, across two different small institutions. We present our exam format and our subjective assessment of the exam format in assessing student knowledge as instructors. We also gather quantitative and qualitative data from student surveys. We surveyed students before and after the oral exam to assess their perceptions of it, including their predicted grade and their subjective opinions and experiences. Our work shows evidence that oral exams are effective and practical mechanisms for software engineering classes of a smaller size (approximately 20 students). Student survey responses indicated favorable feedback for our oral exam format; students viewed oral exams as a good assessment of their knowledge and useful beyond that individual class.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3641554.3701848
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Multi-Institutional Assessment of Oral Exams in Software Courses

Ed Novak, Peter Ohmann
2 citations
Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
6.49
article

A Multi-Institutional Assessment of Oral Exams in Software Courses

Ed Novak, Peter Ohmann
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Oral exams are an inviting alternative to traditional paper-and-pencil exams. However, they are largely under-utilized in computer science education. In this report, we describe our design for comprehensive final oral exams in five software engineering class sections, across two different small institutions. We present our exam format and our subjective assessment of the exam format in assessing student knowledge as instructors. We also gather quantitative and qualitative data from student surveys. We surveyed students before and after the oral exam to assess their perceptions of it, including their predicted grade and their subjective opinions and experiences. Our work shows evidence that oral exams are effective and practical mechanisms for software engineering classes of a smaller size (approximately 20 students). Student survey responses indicated favorable feedback for our oral exam format; students viewed oral exams as a good assessment of their knowledge and useful beyond that individual class.

Franklin & Marshall College (US), College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.