MONTENEGRO RECAP: THE STANDARD OF FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT (FET) AS A CATALYST FOR INVESTMENT DISPUTES

The fair and equitable treatment (FET) standard stands for one of the most significant yet debated principles in safeguarding foreign investments. While its wording is often broad and vague, its definition often emerges through arbitral awards based on the particulars of each case. This paper analyses the FET clauses in Montenegro’s Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) within the context of its EU accession and modern approaches to FET regulation. By examining Montenegrin BITs and reviewing past disputes, the paper explores key aspects of FET application in Montenegro’s Investor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) practice so far. Given that the FET standard has been a central issue in nearly all disputes against Montenegro, the analysis underscores the need to review and refine FET regulation in Montenegrin BITs, in order to ensure better protection for foreign investments and clarify which state actions violate FET. Furthermore, the paper compares Montenegro’s FET clauses with those in EU practice, offering recommendations for aligning it with more robust frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Strani pravni zivot
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56461/spz_24406kj
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MONTENEGRO RECAP: THE STANDARD OF FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT (FET) AS A CATALYST FOR INVESTMENT DISPUTES

Nikolina Tomović
Strani pravni zivot
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

MONTENEGRO RECAP: THE STANDARD OF FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT (FET) AS A CATALYST FOR INVESTMENT DISPUTES

Nikolina Tomović
article en

Abstract

The fair and equitable treatment (FET) standard stands for one of the most significant yet debated principles in safeguarding foreign investments. While its wording is often broad and vague, its definition often emerges through arbitral awards based on the particulars of each case. This paper analyses the FET clauses in Montenegro’s Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) within the context of its EU accession and modern approaches to FET regulation. By examining Montenegrin BITs and reviewing past disputes, the paper explores key aspects of FET application in Montenegro’s Investor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) practice so far. Given that the FET standard has been a central issue in nearly all disputes against Montenegro, the analysis underscores the need to review and refine FET regulation in Montenegrin BITs, in order to ensure better protection for foreign investments and clarify which state actions violate FET. Furthermore, the paper compares Montenegro’s FET clauses with those in EU practice, offering recommendations for aligning it with more robust frameworks.

Strani pravni zivotVol. 68(4)
Klinički Centar Crne Gore (ME)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.