Exploring CS Education Policy Through the Lens of State Governance Models: Access, Accountability and Authority

Computer science (CS) education policy efforts have accelerated since 2016 through the work of various governmental, advocacy, and CS-focused organizations. CS policy implementation is typically led by CS education state supervisors (CSEdSS) at state education agencies (SEA), whose responsibilities may encompass training CS teachers, allocating resources, and informing teacher certification. Despite efforts to expand K-12 CS education through a set of 10 nationally-recommended policies, equity issues persist in terms of access for historically marginalized students to learn CS. Moreover, while states may adopt the same policy, each state has their own model of state education governance (SEG). These models determine authority and accountability - how education decision-making and policies are made and implemented. This study explores the relationship between SEG models and impact of CS education policy implementation by exploring the average rate of growth in access to high school (HS) CS and percent of CS education policies adopted across SEG models. Data sources include publicly available data of secondary CS access and CSEdSS survey and focus groups. Preliminary findings indicate the need to consider SEG models when enacting CS education policy to balance accountability with authority when enacting CS education policy related to expanding equitable and accessible K-12 CS education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3641555.3705181
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Education and Learning Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring CS Education Policy Through the Lens of State Governance Models: Access, Accountability and Authority

Janice Mak, Megean Garvin, Carolina Torrejón Capurro
2 citations
Education and Learning Interventions
6.49
article

Exploring CS Education Policy Through the Lens of State Governance Models: Access, Accountability and Authority

Janice Mak, Megean Garvin, Carolina Torrejón Capurro
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Computer science (CS) education policy efforts have accelerated since 2016 through the work of various governmental, advocacy, and CS-focused organizations. CS policy implementation is typically led by CS education state supervisors (CSEdSS) at state education agencies (SEA), whose responsibilities may encompass training CS teachers, allocating resources, and informing teacher certification. Despite efforts to expand K-12 CS education through a set of 10 nationally-recommended policies, equity issues persist in terms of access for historically marginalized students to learn CS. Moreover, while states may adopt the same policy, each state has their own model of state education governance (SEG). These models determine authority and accountability - how education decision-making and policies are made and implemented. This study explores the relationship between SEG models and impact of CS education policy implementation by exploring the average rate of growth in access to high school (HS) CS and percent of CS education policies adopted across SEG models. Data sources include publicly available data of secondary CS access and CSEdSS survey and focus groups. Preliminary findings indicate the need to consider SEG models when enacting CS education policy to balance accountability with authority when enacting CS education policy related to expanding equitable and accessible K-12 CS education.

Arizona State University (US), University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
National Science Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Education and Learning Interventions
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.