Exploring ChatGPT as a Qualitative Research Assistant

In many CS educational research studies, students are surveyed to understand their reactions to a particular pedagogical approach or tool. These surveys, as well as other types of evaluations, often invite students to provide open-ended feedback about their experiences. However, analyzing these comments can prove to be a challenge, especially to CS educators who may not have strong expertise in qualitative research methods. In addition, in a large study, evaluating all of the provided comments can consume a significant amount of researcher time. In this work, we undertook two separate conversations with ChatGPT in which we prompted it to perform qualitative analysis of a set of comments collected in an earlier study. This allowed us to begin to judge how effectively a modern large language model can serve as an assistant in qualitative analysis. We found that with the prompts we used, ChatGPT can reliably build a set of reasonable labels (codes) for a set of comments, but the application of its labels to specific comments may or may not be effective and human researchers still need to use care and their own understanding in interpreting its output.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3641555.3705180
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring ChatGPT as a Qualitative Research Assistant

Ivona Bezáková, Zack Butler, Angelina Brilliantova
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Exploring ChatGPT as a Qualitative Research Assistant

Ivona Bezáková, Zack Butler, Angelina Brilliantova
article en

Abstract

In many CS educational research studies, students are surveyed to understand their reactions to a particular pedagogical approach or tool. These surveys, as well as other types of evaluations, often invite students to provide open-ended feedback about their experiences. However, analyzing these comments can prove to be a challenge, especially to CS educators who may not have strong expertise in qualitative research methods. In addition, in a large study, evaluating all of the provided comments can consume a significant amount of researcher time. In this work, we undertook two separate conversations with ChatGPT in which we prompted it to perform qualitative analysis of a set of comments collected in an earlier study. This allowed us to begin to judge how effectively a modern large language model can serve as an assistant in qualitative analysis. We found that with the prompts we used, ChatGPT can reliably build a set of reasonable labels (codes) for a set of comments, but the application of its labels to specific comments may or may not be effective and human researchers still need to use care and their own understanding in interpreting its output.

Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring ChatGPT as a Qualitative Research Assistant — Ivona Bezáková, Zack Butler, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS