Analysing the Legal And Regulatory Framework For Decommissioning Offshore Platforms: A Comparison Between Brazil (BR) and the United Kingdom (UK)
Purpose: This article aims to analyze the legal structure of the dimensions involved in the decommissioning process and its implications on the procedures adopted by United Kingdom and the Brazil, based on a systematic literature review. Methodology: The research was conducted through a systematic literature review, analyzing articles obtained from three main databases: CAPES, Crossref, and Google Scholar, in addition to other relevant sources. Results & Discussion: The analysis sought to understand the debate surrounding the applicability of the norms and regulations related to offshore platform decommissioning in both territories. The results indicate that United Kingdom and the Brazil align their legal policies for offshore platform management with international best practices in sustainability. However, contradictions in the implementation of these policies arise, often due to conflicts of interest among the parties involved, a situation more pronounced in Brazil. Conclusion: The analysis reveals that, although both countries strive to align their policies with international standards, national specifics and challenges present difficulties in the application of regulations. The main implication of this study is to provide a systemic view of the decommissioning process, integrating the applicable regulatory dimensions. The study also points to directions for future research, particularly regarding the improvement of policy implementation and the resolution of conflicts of interest in the decommissioning process.
Authors
- Attawan Guerino Locatel Suela (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3475-4495)
- Elesito Lelo-Mali Cairo de Deus
- José Adolfo de Almeida Neto
Publication Details
- Journal
- Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental
- Published
- 2025-02-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v19n2-054
- Primary Topic
- Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00