Patient satisfaction with geriatric and functional assessments and referral to frailty-related interventions among older adults presenting to the University of Colorado Urologic Oncology Multidisciplinary Clinic.

TPS273 Background: Geriatric assessments (GA) are valuable tools for determining the functional age of patients and represent the standard of care in evaluating vulnerabilities in older adults with cancer. In oncological treatment, these assessments can help refer patients to appropriate ancillary resources, such as physical therapists, registered dietitians, and social workers, while also assisting in selecting chemotherapy regimens, surgical interventions, and radiation therapy plans. GA and GA-guided management have been shown to positively impact treatment completion and reduce chemotherapy-related toxicity in two recent randomized clinical trials. However, there is minimal data assessing patient satisfaction with the interventions provided through this assessment. This study aims to evaluate patient experiences and acceptance of GA and fragility-based referrals recommended by GA, while also identifying patient-reported barriers to accessing these referred resources. Understanding patient acceptability towards geriatric and functional assessments, along with the determinants and barriers to referral completion, can provide additional information to improve oncologic care for older patients. Methods: This is a single-center feasibility study enrolling patients aged 65 and older who are diagnosed with genitourinary cancer and present to the University of Colorado Urologic Oncology multi-disciplinary conference (MDC). The primary endpoint is the patient-reported acceptability of incorporating geriatric and functional assessments. The secondary endpoint is patient-reported determinants and barriers to completing appropriate referrals based on findings from the GA. Patients will undergo a Practical Geriatric Assessment (PGA) and a Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADi) assessment. Based on their functional score, patients will be referred to Cancer Rehabilitation Medicine, physical therapy, occupational therapy, or the BfitBwell exercise program. Additionally, if the patient’s weight has decreased by more than 3 kilograms in the 3 months prior to their visit, they will be referred for nutritional support. Patients will also be referred to social services if they report significant concerns regarding their ability to manage daily living activities or if they lack adequate social support. Patient acceptability will be collected using validated acceptability of intervention surveys. Semi-structured qualitative interviews will be conducted 8 weeks after the patient’s MDC visit, focusing on patient-reported determinants and barriers to completing fragility-related referrals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.tps273
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient satisfaction with geriatric and functional assessments and referral to frailty-related interventions among older adults presenting to the University of Colorado Urologic Oncology Multidisciplinary Clinic.

M. Ahmed, Elizabeth Riley Kessler, Franchesca König, Stephanie Lakritz et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Patient satisfaction with geriatric and functional assessments and referral to frailty-related interventions among older adults presenting to the University of Colorado Urologic Oncology Multidisciplinary Clinic.

M. Ahmed, Elizabeth Riley Kessler, Franchesca König, Stephanie Lakritz, Aditya Mantha
article en

Abstract

TPS273 Background: Geriatric assessments (GA) are valuable tools for determining the functional age of patients and represent the standard of care in evaluating vulnerabilities in older adults with cancer. In oncological treatment, these assessments can help refer patients to appropriate ancillary resources, such as physical therapists, registered dietitians, and social workers, while also assisting in selecting chemotherapy regimens, surgical interventions, and radiation therapy plans. GA and GA-guided management have been shown to positively impact treatment completion and reduce chemotherapy-related toxicity in two recent randomized clinical trials. However, there is minimal data assessing patient satisfaction with the interventions provided through this assessment. This study aims to evaluate patient experiences and acceptance of GA and fragility-based referrals recommended by GA, while also identifying patient-reported barriers to accessing these referred resources. Understanding patient acceptability towards geriatric and functional assessments, along with the determinants and barriers to referral completion, can provide additional information to improve oncologic care for older patients. Methods: This is a single-center feasibility study enrolling patients aged 65 and older who are diagnosed with genitourinary cancer and present to the University of Colorado Urologic Oncology multi-disciplinary conference (MDC). The primary endpoint is the patient-reported acceptability of incorporating geriatric and functional assessments. The secondary endpoint is patient-reported determinants and barriers to completing appropriate referrals based on findings from the GA. Patients will undergo a Practical Geriatric Assessment (PGA) and a Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADi) assessment. Based on their functional score, patients will be referred to Cancer Rehabilitation Medicine, physical therapy, occupational therapy, or the BfitBwell exercise program. Additionally, if the patient’s weight has decreased by more than 3 kilograms in the 3 months prior to their visit, they will be referred for nutritional support. Patients will also be referred to social services if they report significant concerns regarding their ability to manage daily living activities or if they lack adequate social support. Patient acceptability will be collected using validated acceptability of intervention surveys. Semi-structured qualitative interviews will be conducted 8 weeks after the patient’s MDC visit, focusing on patient-reported determinants and barriers to completing fragility-related referrals.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
University of Colorado Cancer Center (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.