Nivolumab plus cabozantinib (N+C) vs sunitinib (S) for previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): Final follow-up results from the CheckMate 9ER trial.

439 Background: N+C showed significant benefits vs S in progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) for patients (pts) with previously untreated aRCC from the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial ( N Engl J Med 2021; 384:829–41). We report final results for the trial with a long-term follow-up (min, >5 y), including updated efficacy in intent-to-treat (ITT) pts and by International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk, and safety. Methods: Pts with aRCC were randomized to receive first-line N 240 mg every 2 wk + C 40 mg QD or S 50 mg QD (4 wk of each 6-wk cycle) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (2 y N max.). The primary endpoint was PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included OS, ORR per RECIST v1.1 by BICR, and safety. Results: Median follow-up was 67.6 (range, 60.2–80.2) mo. In ITT pts (N+C, n = 323; S, n = 328), PFS favored N+C vs S (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58 [95% CI, 0.49–0.70]). Median (95% CI) PFS (mPFS) was 16.4 (12.5–19.3) vs 8.3 (7.0–9.7) mo, respectively; 60-mo PFS rates were 13.6% vs 3.6%. OS also favored N+C vs S (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.65–0.96]). Median (95% CI) OS (mOS) was 46.5 (40.6–53.8) vs 35.5 (29.2–42.8) mo, respectively; 60-mo OS rates were 40.9% vs 35.4%. ORR was greater with N+C vs S (55.7% vs 27.4%; complete response [CR], 13.9% vs 4.6%). Duration of response (DOR) rates at 60 mo with N+C vs S were 22.0% vs 10.0%, respectively. Efficacy by IMDC risk groups is reported in the Table. In all treated pts (n = 320 each arm), any-grade (grade ≥ 3) treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97.5% (67.8%) vs 93.1% (55.3%) with N+C vs S. No new deaths due to study drug toxicity occurred since the last database lock. Additional subgroup analyses will be presented. Conclusions: Long-term efficacy benefit was observed with N+C over S in this final follow-up from CheckMate 9ER. There were no new safety signals. The results continue to support N+C as a standard of care for previously untreated aRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03141177 . FAVN+C; n = 74 FAVS; n = 72 INTN+C; n = 188 INTS; n = 188 PoorN+C; n = 61 PoorS; n = 68 PFS HR (95% CI) 0.67 (0.46–0.97) - 0.63 (0.50–0.80) - 0.36 (0.23–0.56) - mPFS (95% CI), mo 21.4 (12.8–24.6) 12.8 (9.4–16.6) 16.6 (11.3–21.7) 8.5 (6.9–10.4) 9.9 (5.9–17.7) 4.2 (2.9–5.7) 60-mo PFS rate, % 15.1 3.9 12.7 4.7 15.7 0 OS HR (95% CI) 1.08 (0.70–1.66) - 0.86 (0.67–1.11) - 0.49 (0.33–0.74) - mOS (95% CI), mo 53.7 (40.8–70.7) 58.9 (46.1–NE) 47.4 (38.2–55.8) 36.2 (25.7–46.3) 34.8 (21.4–53.4) 10.5 (6.8–20.7) 60-mo OS rate, % 46.3 49.4 41.2 38.2 33.1 12.9 ORR (95% CI), % 66.2 (54.3–76.8) 43.1 (31.4–55.3) 55.9 (48.4–63.1) 27.7 (21.4–34.6) 42.6 (30.0–55.9) 10.3 (4.2–20.1) CR, % 16.2 6.9 15.4 4.8 6.6 1.5 60-mo DOR rate, % a 22.0 NE 19.0 13.0 37.0 0 FAV, IMDC favorable; INT, IMDC intermediate; NE, not estimable; poor, IMDC poor. a Based on pts with objective response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.439
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nivolumab plus cabozantinib (N+C) vs sunitinib (S) for previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): Final follow-up results from the CheckMate 9ER trial.

Maria Teresa Bourlon, Yoshihiko Tomita, Amishi Y. Shah, Camillo Porta et al.
11 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
16.70
article

Nivolumab plus cabozantinib (N+C) vs sunitinib (S) for previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): Final follow-up results from the CheckMate 9ER trial.

Maria Teresa Bourlon, Yoshihiko Tomita, Amishi Y. Shah, Camillo Porta, Viktor Fedorov, Andrea B. Apolo, Howard Gurney, Elizabeth Riley Kessler, Bernard Escudier, Toni K. Choueiri, Robert John Motzer, Thomas Powles, Mauricio Burotto, Margarita Askelson, Cristina Suárez, Jens Bedke, Martin Eduardo Richardet, Fatima Rangwala, Julie Panzica, Carlos H. Barrios
article en
11 citations

Abstract

439 Background: N+C showed significant benefits vs S in progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) for patients (pts) with previously untreated aRCC from the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial ( N Engl J Med 2021; 384:829–41). We report final results for the trial with a long-term follow-up (min, >5 y), including updated efficacy in intent-to-treat (ITT) pts and by International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk, and safety. Methods: Pts with aRCC were randomized to receive first-line N 240 mg every 2 wk + C 40 mg QD or S 50 mg QD (4 wk of each 6-wk cycle) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (2 y N max.). The primary endpoint was PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included OS, ORR per RECIST v1.1 by BICR, and safety. Results: Median follow-up was 67.6 (range, 60.2–80.2) mo. In ITT pts (N+C, n = 323; S, n = 328), PFS favored N+C vs S (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58 [95% CI, 0.49–0.70]). Median (95% CI) PFS (mPFS) was 16.4 (12.5–19.3) vs 8.3 (7.0–9.7) mo, respectively; 60-mo PFS rates were 13.6% vs 3.6%. OS also favored N+C vs S (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.65–0.96]). Median (95% CI) OS (mOS) was 46.5 (40.6–53.8) vs 35.5 (29.2–42.8) mo, respectively; 60-mo OS rates were 40.9% vs 35.4%. ORR was greater with N+C vs S (55.7% vs 27.4%; complete response [CR], 13.9% vs 4.6%). Duration of response (DOR) rates at 60 mo with N+C vs S were 22.0% vs 10.0%, respectively. Efficacy by IMDC risk groups is reported in the Table. In all treated pts (n = 320 each arm), any-grade (grade ≥ 3) treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97.5% (67.8%) vs 93.1% (55.3%) with N+C vs S. No new deaths due to study drug toxicity occurred since the last database lock. Additional subgroup analyses will be presented. Conclusions: Long-term efficacy benefit was observed with N+C over S in this final follow-up from CheckMate 9ER. There were no new safety signals. The results continue to support N+C as a standard of care for previously untreated aRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03141177 . FAVN+C; n = 74 FAVS; n = 72 INTN+C; n = 188 INTS; n = 188 PoorN+C; n = 61 PoorS; n = 68 PFS HR (95% CI) 0.67 (0.46–0.97) - 0.63 (0.50–0.80) - 0.36 (0.23–0.56) - mPFS (95% CI), mo 21.4 (12.8–24.6) 12.8 (9.4–16.6) 16.6 (11.3–21.7) 8.5 (6.9–10.4) 9.9 (5.9–17.7) 4.2 (2.9–5.7) 60-mo PFS rate, % 15.1 3.9 12.7 4.7 15.7 0 OS HR (95% CI) 1.08 (0.70–1.66) - 0.86 (0.67–1.11) - 0.49 (0.33–0.74) - mOS (95% CI), mo 53.7 (40.8–70.7) 58.9 (46.1–NE) 47.4 (38.2–55.8) 36.2 (25.7–46.3) 34.8 (21.4–53.4) 10.5 (6.8–20.7) 60-mo OS rate, % 46.3 49.4 41.2 38.2 33.1 12.9 ORR (95% CI), % 66.2 (54.3–76.8) 43.1 (31.4–55.3) 55.9 (48.4–63.1) 27.7 (21.4–34.6) 42.6 (30.0–55.9) 10.3 (4.2–20.1) CR, % 16.2 6.9 15.4 4.8 6.6 1.5 60-mo DOR rate, % a 22.0 NE 19.0 13.0 37.0 0 FAV, IMDC favorable; INT, IMDC intermediate; NE, not estimable; poor, IMDC poor. a Based on pts with objective response.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
National Health Service (GB), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), National Institutes of Health (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Harvard University (US), Exelixis (United States) (US), Queen Mary University of London (GB), The Royal Free Hospital (GB), Cancer Research UK (GB), Institut Gustave Roussy (FR), Westmead Hospital (AU), Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US), Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (MX), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES), Instituto Oncológico de Córdoba (AR), National Cancer Institute (US), Center for Cancer Research (US), Klinikum Stuttgart (DE), Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center (US), Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (ES), University College London (GB), University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT), Niigata University (JP), University of Colorado Denver (US), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
16.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.