Impact of renal cell cancer histology on outcomes of microscopic positive surgical margins and implications on post-surgical follow-up.

519 Background: Positive surgical margins (PSM) are associated with worsened survival outcomes in Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC). Current AUA guidelines recommend intensified post-surgical follow-up and clinical vigilance in patients with PSM. We sought to evaluate outcomes of different RCC-histologies with microscopic-PSM. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing partial nephrectomy (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN) for RCC who had microscopic-PSM. The cohort was divided according to RCC-Histology [Chromophobe-RCC (chRCC); Clear Cell-RCC (ccRCC); Papillary-RCC (pRCC) for descriptive and survival analyses. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality (ACM)/overall survival (OS). Secondary outcome was cancer-specific mortality (CSM)/cancer-specific survival (CSS). Cox proportional hazards multivariable analysis (MVA) was used to elucidate predictive factors for ACM and CSM. Kaplan-Meier Analysis (KMA) was performed to analyze 5-year OSS and CSS. Results: A total of 8100 patients were analyzed, and we identified 312 patients with microscopic-PSM [26 (8.3%), 236 (75.6%), and 50 (16.0%) of patients had chRCC, ccRCC, and pRCC respectively]. Cox-regression revealed ccRCC to be associated with worsened ACM (versus chRCC [referent] HR=7.8, p=0.042), and worsened CSM (versus chRCC [referent] HR=2.97, p=0.033); pRCC did not demonstrate worsened ACM (p=0.148) and CSM (p=0.201). Comparing chRCC, ccRCC, and pRCC, KMA revealed a 5-year OS of 91%, 87%, and 63%, (p=0.024) and 5-year CSS of 93%, 86%, and 65%. KMA comparing microscopic-PSM versus negative surgical margins (NSM) noted no significant difference in 5-year OS for chRCC (85% vs. 86%, p=0.365) or pRCC (80% vs. 84%, p=0.952), but significantly lower 5-year OS in microscopic-PSM in ccRCC (77% vs. 85%, p<0.001). Conclusions: In patients with microscopic-PSM, we noted significant differences according to histology, with ccRCC being associated with significantly worsened survival and mortality outcomes when compared to chRCC and pRCC; microscopic-PSM was also associated with significantly worsened survival compared to NSM in ccRCC, but not chRCC and pRCC. Microscopic-PSM can be considered to represent a higher risk subgroup in ccRCC but not chRCC or pRCC. Intensified post-surgical follow up compared to NSM patient is appropriate in ccRCC, while microscopic-PSM in chRCC and pRCC can be followed similarly to NSM patients with the same histology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.5_suppl.519
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of renal cell cancer histology on outcomes of microscopic positive surgical margins and implications on post-surgical follow-up.

Kazutaka Saito, Viraj A. Master, Dhruv Puri, Yosuke Yasuda et al.
1 links
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
article

Impact of renal cell cancer histology on outcomes of microscopic positive surgical margins and implications on post-surgical follow-up.

Kazutaka Saito, Viraj A. Master, Dhruv Puri, Yosuke Yasuda, Margaret F. Meagher, Dattatraya Patil, Cesare Saitta, Giacomo Musso, Yasuhisa Fujii, Ithaar Derweesh, Luke Wang, Kit L. Yuen
article en

Abstract

519 Background: Positive surgical margins (PSM) are associated with worsened survival outcomes in Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC). Current AUA guidelines recommend intensified post-surgical follow-up and clinical vigilance in patients with PSM. We sought to evaluate outcomes of different RCC-histologies with microscopic-PSM. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing partial nephrectomy (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN) for RCC who had microscopic-PSM. The cohort was divided according to RCC-Histology [Chromophobe-RCC (chRCC); Clear Cell-RCC (ccRCC); Papillary-RCC (pRCC) for descriptive and survival analyses. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality (ACM)/overall survival (OS). Secondary outcome was cancer-specific mortality (CSM)/cancer-specific survival (CSS). Cox proportional hazards multivariable analysis (MVA) was used to elucidate predictive factors for ACM and CSM. Kaplan-Meier Analysis (KMA) was performed to analyze 5-year OSS and CSS. Results: A total of 8100 patients were analyzed, and we identified 312 patients with microscopic-PSM [26 (8.3%), 236 (75.6%), and 50 (16.0%) of patients had chRCC, ccRCC, and pRCC respectively]. Cox-regression revealed ccRCC to be associated with worsened ACM (versus chRCC [referent] HR=7.8, p=0.042), and worsened CSM (versus chRCC [referent] HR=2.97, p=0.033); pRCC did not demonstrate worsened ACM (p=0.148) and CSM (p=0.201). Comparing chRCC, ccRCC, and pRCC, KMA revealed a 5-year OS of 91%, 87%, and 63%, (p=0.024) and 5-year CSS of 93%, 86%, and 65%. KMA comparing microscopic-PSM versus negative surgical margins (NSM) noted no significant difference in 5-year OS for chRCC (85% vs. 86%, p=0.365) or pRCC (80% vs. 84%, p=0.952), but significantly lower 5-year OS in microscopic-PSM in ccRCC (77% vs. 85%, p<0.001). Conclusions: In patients with microscopic-PSM, we noted significant differences according to histology, with ccRCC being associated with significantly worsened survival and mortality outcomes when compared to chRCC and pRCC; microscopic-PSM was also associated with significantly worsened survival compared to NSM in ccRCC, but not chRCC and pRCC. Microscopic-PSM can be considered to represent a higher risk subgroup in ccRCC but not chRCC or pRCC. Intensified post-surgical follow up compared to NSM patient is appropriate in ccRCC, while microscopic-PSM in chRCC and pRCC can be followed similarly to NSM patients with the same histology.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(5_suppl)
Tokyo Medical and Dental University (JP), Emory University (US), UC San Diego Health System (US), University of California San Diego (US), Institute of Science Tokyo (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.