Numerical Predictions of Low-Reynolds-Number Propeller Aeroacoustics: Comparison of Methods at Different Fidelity Levels

Low-Reynolds-number propeller systems have been widely used in aeronautical applications, such as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) and electric propulsion systems. However, the aerodynamic sound of the propeller systems is often significant and can lead to aircraft noise problems. Therefore, effective predictions of propeller noise are important for designing aircraft, and the different phases in aircraft design require specific prediction approaches. This paper aimed to perform a comparison study on numerical methods at different fidelity levels for predicting the aerodynamic noise of low-Reynolds-number propellers. The Ffowcs-Williams and Hawkings (FWH), Hanson, and Gutin methods were assessed as, respectively, high-, medium-, and low-fidelity noise models. And a coarse-grid large eddy simulation was performed to model the propeller aerodynamics and to inform the three noise models. A popular propeller configuration, which has been used in previous experimental and numerical studies on propeller noise, was employed. This configuration consisted of a two-bladed propeller mounted on a cylindrical nacelle. The propeller had a diameter of D=9″ and a pitch-to-diameter ratio of P/D=1, and was operated in a forward-flight condition with a chord-based Reynolds number of Re=4.8×104, a tip Mach number of M=0.231, and an advance ratio of J=0.485. The results were validated against existing experimental measurements. The propeller flow was characterized by significant tip vortices, weak separation over the leading edges of the blade suction sides, and small-scale vortical structures from the blade trailing edges. The far-field noise was characterized by tonal noise, as well as broadband noise. The mechanism of the noise generation and propagation were clarified. The capacities of the three noise modeling methods for predicting such propeller noise were evaluated and compared.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aerospace
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12020154
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.97

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical Predictions of Low-Reynolds-Number Propeller Aeroacoustics: Comparison of Methods at Different Fidelity Levels

Atif Riaz, Xin Chen, Anupama Sharma, Gengyou Huang et al.
5 citations
Aerospace
Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
24.97
article

Numerical Predictions of Low-Reynolds-Number Propeller Aeroacoustics: Comparison of Methods at Different Fidelity Levels

Atif Riaz, Xin Chen, Anupama Sharma, Gengyou Huang, Richard Jefferson-Loveday
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Low-Reynolds-number propeller systems have been widely used in aeronautical applications, such as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) and electric propulsion systems. However, the aerodynamic sound of the propeller systems is often significant and can lead to aircraft noise problems. Therefore, effective predictions of propeller noise are important for designing aircraft, and the different phases in aircraft design require specific prediction approaches. This paper aimed to perform a comparison study on numerical methods at different fidelity levels for predicting the aerodynamic noise of low-Reynolds-number propellers. The Ffowcs-Williams and Hawkings (FWH), Hanson, and Gutin methods were assessed as, respectively, high-, medium-, and low-fidelity noise models. And a coarse-grid large eddy simulation was performed to model the propeller aerodynamics and to inform the three noise models. A popular propeller configuration, which has been used in previous experimental and numerical studies on propeller noise, was employed. This configuration consisted of a two-bladed propeller mounted on a cylindrical nacelle. The propeller had a diameter of D=9″ and a pitch-to-diameter ratio of P/D=1, and was operated in a forward-flight condition with a chord-based Reynolds number of Re=4.8×104, a tip Mach number of M=0.231, and an advance ratio of J=0.485. The results were validated against existing experimental measurements. The propeller flow was characterized by significant tip vortices, weak separation over the leading edges of the blade suction sides, and small-scale vortical structures from the blade trailing edges. The far-field noise was characterized by tonal noise, as well as broadband noise. The mechanism of the noise generation and propagation were clarified. The capacities of the three noise modeling methods for predicting such propeller noise were evaluated and compared.

AerospaceVol. 12(2)
King's College London (GB), Cranfield University (GB)
Aerospace Technology Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
24.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.