Understanding intergroup violence justification: the role of ethnicity and perceived threat in Israeli society

Research has shown that perceived realistic and symbolic threats are linked with negative attitudes and prejudice toward out-group members. Additionally, levels of perceived group threat regarding out-groups can affect intergroup violence justification. Based on the Integrated Threat Theory (ITT), the current study aimed to expand existing knowledge by examining a conceptual model in which perceived threat mediates the relationship between ethnicity and intergroup violence justification among Jews and Arabs in Israel. The study involved 324 Israeli-Jewish and 325 Israeli-Arabs, who answered questions regarding perceived out-group threat and intergroup violence justification. Findings revealed that (a) Jews were more likely to justify intergroup violence than Arabs, and (b) perceived realistic threat mediates the relationship between ethnic affiliation and intergroup violence justification only among Jews. These results underscore the importance of understanding intergroup conflicts in the field of criminology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1508324
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
33.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding intergroup violence justification: the role of ethnicity and perceived threat in Israeli society

Nir Rozmann
8 citations
Frontiers in Psychology
Social and Intergroup Psychology
33.61
article

Understanding intergroup violence justification: the role of ethnicity and perceived threat in Israeli society

Nir Rozmann
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Research has shown that perceived realistic and symbolic threats are linked with negative attitudes and prejudice toward out-group members. Additionally, levels of perceived group threat regarding out-groups can affect intergroup violence justification. Based on the Integrated Threat Theory (ITT), the current study aimed to expand existing knowledge by examining a conceptual model in which perceived threat mediates the relationship between ethnicity and intergroup violence justification among Jews and Arabs in Israel. The study involved 324 Israeli-Jewish and 325 Israeli-Arabs, who answered questions regarding perceived out-group threat and intergroup violence justification. Findings revealed that (a) Jews were more likely to justify intergroup violence than Arabs, and (b) perceived realistic threat mediates the relationship between ethnic affiliation and intergroup violence justification only among Jews. These results underscore the importance of understanding intergroup conflicts in the field of criminology.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 16
Western Galilee College (IL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
33.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Understanding intergroup violence justification: the role of ethnicity and perceived threat in Israeli society — Nir Rozmann · Frontiers in Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS