Comment on ‘Pressure of Coulomb systems with volume-dependent long-range potentials’

Abstract In this note, we address some issues concerning the accurate pressure calculation of Coulomb systems with periodic boundary conditions. First, we prove that the formulas for the excess part of the pressure with Ewald summation also reduce to the ensemble average of one-third of the ratio between the potential energy and the volume so that the comments on our previous work in a recent paper by Onegin et al (2024 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 57 205002) are incorrect. Second, we demonstrate that in charge non-neutral systems, the pressure expression must be corrected to include interactions with the neutralizing background. This addresses the issues about pressure computation in LAMMPS raised in the paper by Onegin et al . Numerical experiments are performed to verify that the pressure obtained via Ewald summation with corrected terms agrees with the average pressure using thermodynamics for the non-neutral OCP system, and are independent of the splitting parameter in the Ewald summation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/adb3fd
Citations
4
Primary Topic
High-pressure geophysics and materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comment on ‘Pressure of Coulomb systems with volume-dependent long-range potentials’

Jiuyang Liang, Zhenli Xu, Lei Li
4 citations
Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical
High-pressure geophysics and materials
7.47
article

Comment on ‘Pressure of Coulomb systems with volume-dependent long-range potentials’

Jiuyang Liang, Zhenli Xu, Lei Li
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this note, we address some issues concerning the accurate pressure calculation of Coulomb systems with periodic boundary conditions. First, we prove that the formulas for the excess part of the pressure with Ewald summation also reduce to the ensemble average of one-third of the ratio between the potential energy and the volume so that the comments on our previous work in a recent paper by Onegin et al (2024 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 57 205002) are incorrect. Second, we demonstrate that in charge non-neutral systems, the pressure expression must be corrected to include interactions with the neutralizing background. This addresses the issues about pressure computation in LAMMPS raised in the paper by Onegin et al . Numerical experiments are performed to verify that the pressure obtained via Ewald summation with corrected terms agrees with the average pressure using thermodynamics for the non-neutral OCP system, and are independent of the splitting parameter in the Ewald summation.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and TheoreticalVol. 58(8)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Flatiron Health (United States) (US), Institute of Natural Science (KP)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Science and Technology Innovation Plan Of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
High-pressure geophysics and materials
7.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comment on ‘Pressure of Coulomb systems with volume-dependent long-range potentials’ — Jiuyang Liang, Zhenli Xu, et al. · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS