Neural networks trained with SGD learn distributions of increasing complexity<sup>*</sup>
Abstract The uncanny ability of over-parameterised neural networks to generalise well has been explained using various ‘simplicity biases’. These theories postulate that neural networks avoid overfitting by first fitting simple, linear classifiers before learning more complex, non-linear functions. Meanwhile, data structure is also recognised as a key ingredient for good generalisation, yet its role in simplicity bias is not yet understood. Here, we show that neural networks trained using stochastic gradient descent initially classify their inputs using lower-order input statistics, such as mean and covariance, and exploit higher-order statistics only later during training. We first demonstrate this distributional simplicity bias (DSB) in a solvable model of a single neuron trained on synthetic data. We then demonstrate DSB empirically in a range of deep convolutional networks and visual transformers trained on CIFAR10, and show that it even holds in networks pre-trained on ImageNet. We discuss the relation of DSB to other simplicity biases and consider its implications for the principle of Gaussian universality in learning.
Authors
- Maria Refinetti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0148-8074)
- Alessandro Ingrosso (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5430-7559)
- Sebastian Goldt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5799-7644)
Institutions
- The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) (IT)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (IT)
- Université Paris Cité (FR)
- Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR)
- Sorbonne Université (FR)
- Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR)
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment
- Published
- 2025-02-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/ad8bb8
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Neural Networks and Applications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.48