The Use of the National Stressful Events Survey Acute Stress Disorder Short Scale (NSESSS) to Assess the Prevalence and Predictability of Acute Stress Disorder in Trauma Patients

Introduction: Acute Stress Disorder (ASD) causes symptoms like distractibility, irritability, and emotional detachment, lasting three days to one month after a traumatic event. In 2021, about 40 million emergency department (ED) visits were recorded for acute injuries, highlighting the need for stress quantification. The National Stressful Events Survey Acute Stress Disorder Short Scale (NSESSS) measures ASD severity in adults following extreme stress, with scores ≥14 indicating severe symptoms. Few studies have examined the NSESSS for trauma patients. We aim to assess the NSESSS's effectiveness in understanding trauma's impact on patient well-being, identifying patient improvement, and improving outcomes. Methods: This observational single-center study was conducted at a community hospital. Participants were at least 18 years old, arrived at the ED for acute injuries between January 2021 and December 2023, and consented to an ASD evaluation. Social workers administered the NSESSS upon hospital arrival, followed by a psychiatric evaluation within 48 hours. Patients were then reassessed by a psychiatrist with the NSESSS and DSM-5 criteria within seven days, with phone follow-ups for those discharged earlier. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. Results: The study included 27 patients, 17 (63%) of whom were male, and 9 (27%) had pre-existing psychiatric comorbidities. The median age was 41 years (IQR 27-54), and the median NSESSS score was 6 (IQR 2-15). Among participants, 8 were true positives (NSESSS score ≥14 and met ASD DSM-5 criteria), 17 were true negatives (NSESSS score <14 and did not meet ASD DSM-5 criteria), and 2 were false negatives (NSESSS score <14 but met ASD DSM-5 criteria). There were no false positives. Conclusion: The NSESSS demonstrated internal consistency and validity, emerging as a promising tool for assessing ASD severity and tracking treatment progress in trauma patients. Early recognition and intervention for ASD are crucial in mitigating long-term adverse outcomes, highlighting the need for further research to understand its impact on patient well-being.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research
Published
2025-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/jammr/2025/v37i35747
Primary Topic
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Use of the National Stressful Events Survey Acute Stress Disorder Short Scale (NSESSS) to Assess the Prevalence and Predictability of Acute Stress Disorder in Trauma Patients

Priya Shah, Nicole Ann E Villa, Amit Vij, Eduardo D Espiridion
1 links
Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
article

The Use of the National Stressful Events Survey Acute Stress Disorder Short Scale (NSESSS) to Assess the Prevalence and Predictability of Acute Stress Disorder in Trauma Patients

Priya Shah, Nicole Ann E Villa, Amit Vij, Eduardo D Espiridion
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Acute Stress Disorder (ASD) causes symptoms like distractibility, irritability, and emotional detachment, lasting three days to one month after a traumatic event. In 2021, about 40 million emergency department (ED) visits were recorded for acute injuries, highlighting the need for stress quantification. The National Stressful Events Survey Acute Stress Disorder Short Scale (NSESSS) measures ASD severity in adults following extreme stress, with scores ≥14 indicating severe symptoms. Few studies have examined the NSESSS for trauma patients. We aim to assess the NSESSS's effectiveness in understanding trauma's impact on patient well-being, identifying patient improvement, and improving outcomes. Methods: This observational single-center study was conducted at a community hospital. Participants were at least 18 years old, arrived at the ED for acute injuries between January 2021 and December 2023, and consented to an ASD evaluation. Social workers administered the NSESSS upon hospital arrival, followed by a psychiatric evaluation within 48 hours. Patients were then reassessed by a psychiatrist with the NSESSS and DSM-5 criteria within seven days, with phone follow-ups for those discharged earlier. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. Results: The study included 27 patients, 17 (63%) of whom were male, and 9 (27%) had pre-existing psychiatric comorbidities. The median age was 41 years (IQR 27-54), and the median NSESSS score was 6 (IQR 2-15). Among participants, 8 were true positives (NSESSS score ≥14 and met ASD DSM-5 criteria), 17 were true negatives (NSESSS score <14 and did not meet ASD DSM-5 criteria), and 2 were false negatives (NSESSS score <14 but met ASD DSM-5 criteria). There were no false positives. Conclusion: The NSESSS demonstrated internal consistency and validity, emerging as a promising tool for assessing ASD severity and tracking treatment progress in trauma patients. Early recognition and intervention for ASD are crucial in mitigating long-term adverse outcomes, highlighting the need for further research to understand its impact on patient well-being.

Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical ResearchVol. 37(3)
Reading Hospital (US), Drexel University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.